Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 25, 2026

Benefits of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in an Asynchronous Heart Failure Model Induced by Left Bundle Branch Ablation and Rapid Pacing
Published on: December 11, 2017
Comparison of left ventricular reverse remodeling induced by cardiac contractility modulation and cardiac
Qing Zhang1, Yat-Sun Chan, Yu-Jia Liang
1Li Ka Shing Institute of Health Sciences, Institute of Vascular Medicine and Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine and Therapeutics, Prince of Wales Hospital, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.
Insights
Cardiac contractility modulation (CCM) offers similar left ventricular reverse remodeling as cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) in heart failure patients with narrow QRS. However, CRT shows greater benefits in patients with very wide QRS durations.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Medical Devices
- Heart Failure Management
Background:
- Cardiac contractility modulation (CCM) is an emerging therapy for advanced systolic heart failure.
- CCM is indicated for patients with normal QRS duration, unsuitable for cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT).
- Both CCM and CRT have shown left ventricular (LV) reverse remodeling, but direct comparisons are limited.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the extent of LV reverse remodeling between CCM and CRT in heart failure patients.
- To evaluate the efficacy of CCM versus CRT across different QRS durations.
Main Methods:
- Observational study of three heart failure groups (LV ejection fraction <35% despite optimal medical therapy).
- Group 1: CCM (n=33, QRS <120 ms).
- Group 2: CRT (n=43, QRS 120-150 ms).
- Group 3: CRT (n=56, QRS >150 ms).
- LV end-systolic volume (LVESV) measured at baseline and 3 months.
Main Results:
- Significant LV reverse remodeling observed in all groups.
- Similar LVESV reduction in CCM (Group 1) and CRT with mildly prolonged QRS (Group 2) (-11.3% vs. -13.6%, p=0.833).
- Greater LVESV reduction with CRT in patients with very wide QRS (Group 3) (-25.0%, p<0.01 vs. Groups 1 & 2).
- Responder rates (≥15% LVESV reduction) were comparable for CCM and CRT in narrow/mildly prolonged QRS (39% vs. 42%), but significantly higher for CRT in very wide QRS (68%, p=0.009).
Conclusions:
- CCM demonstrates comparable LV reverse remodeling to CRT in heart failure patients with normal QRS duration.
- CRT shows superior LV reverse remodeling compared to CCM in patients with very wide QRS durations.
- Device selection should consider QRS duration for optimal heart failure management.
Background:
Cardiac contractility modulation (CCM) is a new device-based therapy for advanced systolic heart failure with normal QRS duration and therefore not suitable for cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). Left ventricular (LV) reverse remodeling was reported in patients treated with CCM or CRT, however, the extent of response was not compared.
Methods:
This observational study consisted of three groups of patients with symptomatic heart failure and LV ejection fraction <35% despite optimal medical therapy. Group 1 included those received CCM with a QRS duration <120 ms (n=33), Group 2 included those received CRT with a QRS duration of 120-150 ms (n=43), and Group 3 included those received CRT with a QRS duration >150 ms (n=56). LV end-systolic volume (LVESV) was measured at baseline and 3 months later.
Results:
Age, gender, etiology of heart failure and baseline ejection fraction were comparable. A significant LV reverse remodeling was observed in each group. The degree of LVESV reduction was similar between Group 1 and Group 2 (-11.3 ± 1 1.8 vs. -13.6 ± 18.3%, p=0.833), however, it was greater in Group 3 (-25.0 ± 18.0%, both p<0.01). By using the reduction ≥ 15%, the responder rate was not different between Group 1 (39%) and Group 2 (42%), but significantly higher in Group 3 (68%) (χ(2)=9.514, p=0.009).
Conclusion:
CCM exhibited a similar LV reverse remodeling response to CRT for patients with a mildly prolonged QRS, though the effect was less strong when compared to CRT for patients with a very wide QRS.
Related Concept Videos
Cardiomyopathy II: Dilated Cardiomyopathy
Cardiomyopathy IV: Restrictive Cardiomyopathy
Cardiomyopathy V: Interprofessional Care
Cardiomyopathy III: Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy

