Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 25, 2026

Visualizing Visual Adaptation
Published on: April 24, 2017
Systematic violations of von Kries rule reveal its limitations for explaining color and lightness constancy
Janus J Kulikowski1, Ausra Daugirdiene, Athanasios Panorgias
1Faculty of Life Sciences, Carys Bannister Building, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PT UK.
Abstract:
Cone contrast remains constant, when the same object/background is seen under different illuminations-the von Kries rule [Shevell, Vis. Res. 18, 1649 (1978)]. Here we explore this idea using asymmetric color matching. We find that von Kries adaptation holds, regardless of whether chromatic constancy index is low or high. When illumination changes the stimulus luminance (reflectance), lightness constancy is weak and matching is dictated by object/background luminance contrast. When this contrast is masked or disrupted, lightness constancy mechanisms are more prominent. Thus von Kries adaptation is incompatible with lightness constancy, suggesting that cortical mechanisms must underlie color constancy, as expected from neurophysiological studies [Zeki, Nature 284, 412 (1980); Wild, Nature 313, 133 (1985)].
Related Concept Videos
Perceptual Constancy
Size constancy is the recognition that an object remains the same size, even when its image on the retina changes. For instance, a bus is perceived to be large enough to carry people, even if it looks tiny from...
Color Vision
Photoreceptors and Visual Pathways
Gestalt Principles of Perception
UV–Vis Spectroscopy: Woodward–Fieser Rules
Difference from Background: Limit of Detection
The LOD indicates the presence or absence...

