Cross-modal exercise prescription at absolute and relative oxygen uptake using perceived exertion

Cross-modal exercise prescription at absolute and relative oxygen uptake using perceived exertion. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc., Vol. 22, No. 5, pp. 653-659, 1990. The validity of cross-modal prescription of exercise intensity based on rated perceived exertion (RPE) was determined for eight men (26 +/- SE 1.9 yr) at absolute and relative VO2. Exercise modes were treadmill (TM), cycle ergometer (C), and bench stepping while pumping 0.91 kg handweights (HB). Relative (Rel) constant load sessions were performed for each mode at 70% of mode-specific VO2 peak. Absolute (Absol) constant load sessions were performed for C and HB at the VO2 equivalent to 70% of TM VO2 peak. The five 12 min sessions were presented on separate days in random order. RPE-Overall during TM-Rel (11.1) was a) lower (P less than 0.05) than C-Absol (12.6) and HB-Absol (12.5) and b) the same as C-Rel (11.3) and HB-Rel (10.7). RPE-Legs during TM-Rel was a) lower (P less than 0.05) than C-Absol and HB-Absol and b) the same as C-Rel and HB-Rel. RPE-Chest a) did not differ between TM-Rel and C-Absol or HB-Absol and b) was lower (P less than 0.05) for C-Rel and HB-Rel than TM-Rel. RPE-Arms was higher (P less than 0.05) for C-Absol, HB-Absol, and HB-Rel than TM-Rel but did not differ between TM-Rel and C-Rel. Oxygen uptake, heart rate, and ventilation during TM-Rel were a) the same as C-Absol and HB-Absol and b) higher (P less than 0.05) than C-Rel and HB-Rel. Perceptually based cross-modal prescription of exercise intensity using a psychophysical estimation method is valid provided that the physiological reference is the relative, not the absolute, VO2.