Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 6, 2026

Flexible Colonoscopy in Mice to Evaluate the Severity of Colitis and Colorectal Tumors Using a Validated Endoscopic Scoring System
Published on: October 17, 2013
Construct definition and scale development for defensive information processing: an application to colorectal cancer
Amy McQueen1, Sally W Vernon, Paul R Swank
1School of Medicine, Washington University. amcqueen@dom.wustl.edu
This study developed and tested new measures for defensive strategies, like avoidance and counterarguing, in response to health risks such as colorectal cancer screening. These tools aim to improve understanding and interventions for resistant individuals.
Area of Science:
- Health Communication
- Psychology
- Public Health
Background:
- Individuals employ various defensive strategies when faced with negative health information.
- Defensive processes are not well-conceptualized or measured outside of psychopathology.
- Colorectal cancer screening is a critical public health issue where defensiveness can be a barrier.
Purpose of the Study:
- To develop an integrated conceptual model of defensive strategies.
- To create and validate measurement scales for defensiveness related to colorectal cancer screening.
- To enhance understanding and intervention design for individuals resistant to health risk information.
Main Methods:
- Literature review to inform a conceptual model of defensive strategies.
- Development of measurement scales for 4 stages of defensive processing: attention avoidance, blunting, suppression, and counterarguing.
- Iterative testing and refinement of measures using confirmatory factor analysis and structural equation models on two independent adult samples (n=226, 287).
Main Results:
- The conceptual model guided the creation of validated subscales (3-8 items) for defensive information processing.
- Measures demonstrated good internal reliability and expected associations with colorectal cancer screening correlates.
- Scale items showed invariance across adherence status to screening guidelines, indicating reliability.
Conclusions:
- The developed conceptual model and measurement scales offer a foundation for future research and validation.
- These tools are expected to advance the understanding of defensive processes in health contexts.
- The measures can inform the design and evaluation of interventions targeting resistant populations for improved cancer risk communication and screening adherence.
More Related Videos
06:46Competing-Risk Nomogram for Predicting Cancer-Specific Survival in Multiple Primary Colorectal Cancer Patients after Surgery
Published on: September 27, 2024
07:13Comparison of Predictive Performance of Three Lymph Node Staging Systems in Colorectal Signet Ring Cell Carcinoma Based on Machine Learning Model
Published on: April 18, 2025