Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 24, 2026

Automated Multiplex Immunofluorescence Panel for Immuno-oncology Studies on Formalin-fixed Carcinoma Tissue Specimens
Published on: January 21, 2019
Non-specific binding of antibodies in immunohistochemistry: fallacies and facts
Igor Buchwalow1, Vera Samoilova, Werner Boecker
1Institute for Hematopathology , Fangdieckstr. 75a, 22547 Hamburg, Germany. buchwalow@pathologie-hh.de
Abstract:
The current protocols for blocking background staining in immunohistochemistry are based on conflicting reports. Background staining is thought to occur as a result of either non-specific antibody (Ab) binding to endogenous Fc receptors (FcRs) or a combination of ionic and hydrophobic interactions. In this study, cell and tissue samples were processed according to routine protocols either with or without a blocking step (goat serum or BSA). Surprisingly, no Abs in samples processed without a blocking step showed any propensity for non-specific binding leading to background staining, implying that endogenous FcRs do not retain their ability to bind the Fc portion of Abs after standard fixation. Likewise, we did not find any non-specific Ab binding ascribable to either ionic or hydrophobic interactions. We determined that traditionally used protein blocking steps are unnecessary in the immunostaining of routinely fixed cell and tissue samples.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Immunofluorescence Microscopy
The...
Immunocytochemistry and Immunohistochemistry
These...
Immunoprecipitation
Chromatin Immunoprecipitation
Chromatin immunoprecipitation, also known as ChIP, is used to study protein-DNA or...

