Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 24, 2026

11:44
Monochrome Multiplex Quantitative PCR Telomere Length Measurement
Published on: March 22, 2024
Should I repeat my 1:2s QC rejection?
Curtis A Parvin1, Lakshmi Kuchipudi, John C Yundt-Pacheco
1Bio-Rad Laboratories, Quality Systems Division, Plano, TX 75074, USA. curtis_parvin@bio-rad.com
Clinical Chemistry
|February 24, 2012
Summary
Repeating quality control (QC) outside 2SD (1:2s rule) is common but unevaluated. This study shows repeat-sampling strategies are effective, offering power comparable to 1:2s and 1:3s QC rules with modest increases in control testing.
Area of Science:
- Clinical Chemistry
- Laboratory Quality Control
Background:
- Repeating quality control (QC) samples outside 2 standard deviations (1:2s rule) is a frequent practice.
- Despite its common use, the statistical power of this repeat-sampling approach has not been rigorously evaluated.
Purpose of the Study:
- To mathematically and computationally evaluate the power of 1:2s repeat-sampling strategies.
- To compare the effectiveness of these strategies against established QC rules (1:2s, 1:3s) and common multirules.
Main Methods:
- Power functions were computed using mathematical calculations and computer simulations.
- Four distinct 1:2s repeat-sampling strategies were analyzed.
- Performance was benchmarked against the 1:2s rule, 1:3s rule, and two common QC multirules.
Main Results:
- Repeat-sampling strategies demonstrated low false-rejection rates, similar to the 1:3s QC rule.
- Error detection rates for repeat-sampling approached those of the 1:2s rule for significant errors.
- The power of repeat-sampling strategies generally exceeded that of the evaluated QC multirules, with a 4-13% increase in QC utilization.
Conclusions:
- Repeat-sampling strategies effectively combine the benefits of 1:2s and 1:3s QC rules.
- These strategies offer favorable power compared to common QC multirules.
- The enhanced performance is achieved with a minor increase in the average number of controls tested.
Related Concept Videos
Detection of Gross Error: The Q Test
When one or more data points appear far from the rest of the data, there is a need to determine whether they are outliers and whether they should be eliminated from the data set to ensure an accurate representation of the measured value. In many cases, outliers arise from gross errors (or human errors) and do not accurately reflect the underlying phenomenon. In some cases, however, these apparent outliers reflect true phenomenological differences. In these cases, we can use statistical methods...
Quantifying and Rejecting Outliers: The Grubbs Test
Sometimes, a data set can have a recorded numerical observation that greatly deviates from the rest of the data. Assuming that the data is normally distributed, a statistical method called the Grubbs test can be used to determine whether the observation is truly an outlier. To perform a two-tailed Grubbs test, first, calculate the absolute difference between the outlier and the mean. Then, calculate the ratio between this difference and the standard deviation of the sample. This number is...
Cochran's Q Test
Cochran's Q Test is a nonparametric statistical test used to determine if there are potential differences in the outcomes of three or more related groups on a binary (yes/no) or dichotomous outcome. It is essentially an extension of the McNemar Test, which is limited to two related samples - Cochran's Q test can handle three or more related samples, making it more versatile in scenarios where subjects are measured under multiple conditions. The test statistic follows a Chi-Square distribution,...
