Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 24, 2026

Subcutaneous Infection of Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus (MRSA)
Published on: February 9, 2011
Treatment outcome of dogs with meticillin-resistant and meticillin-susceptible Staphylococcus pseudintermedius
Jacqueline Bryan1, Linda A Frank, Barton W Rohrbach
1Department of Small Animal Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN 37996, USA. jbryan37@utk.edu
Background:
The prevalence of meticillin- and multidrug-resistant Staphylococcus pseudintermedius (MRSP) in canine pyoderma has been increasing in recent years; thus, treatment of these cases has become challenging.
Hypothesis/Objectives:
To compare treatment outcome (clinical resolution and treatment duration), adverse effects of medication, and concurrent diseases and medications in dogs with meticillin-susceptible S. pseudintermedius (MSSP) and MRSP pyoderma. ANIMALS/METHODS: Medical records were reviewed retrospectively, and 123 MSSP and 93 MRSP clinical cases between January 2008 and April 2010 were included.
Results:
In MSSP infections, cefalexin and cefpodoxime were the most commonly prescribed antimicrobials, accounting for 43.2 and 34.4% of cases, respectively. In MRSP infections, chloramphenicol and doxycycline were most commonly prescribed, accounting for 52.6 and 14.4% of cases, respectively. Adverse effects were reported in seven MSSP and 31 MRSP cases. The most commonly reported adverse effects were gastrointestinal, prompting antibiotic discontinuation in three MSSP and 20 MRSP cases. Chloramphenicol was associated with the highest incidence of adverse reactions (27 of 51 cases). Of 164 cases with follow up, 43 of 88 MSSP infections and 29 of 76 MRSP infections achieved complete clinical resolution at the first recheck examination. Three MSSP and seven MRSP cases failed to improve or resolve at subsequent visits assessed at 3-4 week intervals.
Conclusions And Clinical Importance:
Results from this study showed that the majority of pyodermas resolved regardless of meticillin susceptibility. Although some cases of MRSP pyoderma took longer to treat, this is likely to be because of chronicity and not the organism. In addition, adverse effects were frequently associated with chloramphenicol administration.
Insights
Canine pyoderma caused by meticillin-susceptible Staphylococcus pseudintermedius (MSSP) and meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus pseudintermedius (MRSP) generally resolves. Chloramphenicol use in MRSP cases was linked to more adverse effects and longer treatment durations.
Area of Science:
- Veterinary Dermatology
- Antimicrobial Resistance
- Canine Health
Background:
- Increasing prevalence of meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus pseudintermedius (MRSP) in canine pyoderma presents treatment challenges.
- Canine pyoderma requires effective treatment strategies for both susceptible and resistant bacterial strains.
Purpose of the Study:
- Compare treatment outcomes for canine pyoderma caused by meticillin-susceptible S. pseudintermedius (MSSP) and MRSP.
- Evaluate adverse effects and concurrent factors in dogs with MSSP and MRSP pyoderma.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective review of medical records from January 2008 to April 2010.
- Inclusion of 123 MSSP and 93 MRSP canine pyoderma cases.
- Analysis of clinical resolution, treatment duration, and adverse drug reactions.
Main Results:
- Cefalexin and cefpodoxime were common for MSSP; chloramphenicol and doxycycline for MRSP.
- Adverse effects, mainly gastrointestinal, were more frequent in MRSP cases (31/93) than MSSP (7/123).
- Chloramphenicol was associated with the highest incidence of adverse reactions (27/51).
Conclusions:
- Most canine pyodermas resolved irrespective of meticillin susceptibility.
- Longer treatment duration in MRSP cases may relate to chronicity rather than the organism itself.
- Chloramphenicol administration frequently led to adverse effects in dogs.
Related Concept Videos
Clinical Significance of Antibiotic Resistance
Staphylococcal Skin Infections
Mechanism of Antibiotic Resistance in MRSA
Acute Pyelonephritis II: Diagnostic Studies and Management