Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 24, 2026

Image Acquisition using Portable Sonography for Emergency Airway Management
Published on: September 28, 2022
Management of foreign bodies in the airway and oesophagus
Hugo Rodríguez1, Giulio Cesare Passali, Dario Gregori
1Hospital de Pediatría Juan P Garrahan, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Insights
Foreign body ingestion and aspiration in children are common and can mimic other illnesses, delaying diagnosis. Prevention through parent education and product safety is crucial.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Emergency Medicine
- Otolaryngology
- Gastroenterology
Background:
- Foreign body (FB) ingestion and aspiration are common, avoidable incidents in children aged 1-3 years.
- Risk factors include mouthing objects, poor chewing ability, and distraction during eating.
- Symptoms can mimic other pediatric conditions, potentially delaying diagnosis.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review the clinical phases, common locations, diagnostic approaches, and management strategies for foreign body ingestion and aspiration in children.
- To emphasize the importance of prompt diagnosis and endoscopic removal.
Main Methods:
- Review of clinical presentation, diagnostic modalities (history, radiology), and management options for airway and esophageal foreign bodies.
- Discussion of the three clinical phases: initial impaction, asymptomatic, and complication phases.
Main Results:
- Bronchus is the most common location for airway foreign bodies (80-90%).
- Esophageal foreign bodies are more common than bronchial but often migrate spontaneously.
- Endoscopic removal is the treatment of choice for airway and esophageal foreign bodies.
Conclusions:
- Foreign body ingestion/aspiration in children is multifactorial with varied patient responses.
- Prevention through parental education on age-appropriate items and toy safety standards is paramount.
- Timely endoscopic intervention is critical for favorable outcomes.
Background:
Ingestion and/or aspiration of foreign bodies (FB) are avoidable incidents. Children between 1 and 3 years are common victims for many reasons: exploration of the environment through the mouth, lack of molars which decreases their ability to properly chew food, lack of cognitive capacity to distinguish between edible and inedible objects, and tendency to distraction and to perform other activities, like playing, whilst eating. Most FBs are expelled spontaneously, but a significant percentage impacts the upper aerodigestive tract. Approximately 80% of children's choking episodes are evaluated by pediatricians. The symptoms of aspiration or ingestion of FBs can simulate different paediatric diseases such as asthma, croup or pneumonia, delaying the correct diagnosis.
Symptoms:
There are three clinical phases both in aspiration and in ingestion of FBs: initial stage (first stage or impaction or FB) shows choking, gagging and paroxysms of coughing, obstruction of the airway (AW), occurring at the time of aspiration or ingestion. These signs calm down when the FB lodges and the reflexes grow weary (second stage or asymptomatic phase). Complications occur in the third stage (also defined as complications' phase), when the obstruction, erosion or infection cause pneumonia, atelectasis, abscess or fever (FB in AW), or dysphagia, mediastinum abscess, perforation or erosion and oesophagus (FB in the oesophagus). The first symptoms to receive medical care may actually represent a complication of impaction of FB. LOCATIONS AND MANAGEMENT: Determining the site of obstruction is important in managing the problem. The location of the FB depends on its characteristics and also on the position of the person at the time of aspiration. Determining the site of obstruction is important in managing the problem. Larynx and trachea have the lowest prevalence, except in children under 1year. They are linked with the most dangerous outcomes, complete obstruction or rupture. Bronchus is the preferred location in 80-90% of AW's cases. Esophageal FBs are twice more common than bronchial FBs, although most of these migrate to the stomach and do not require endoscopic removal. Diagnosis of FB proceeds following the traditional steps, with a particular stress on history and radiological findings as goal standards for the FB retrieval. The treatment of choice for AW's and esophageal FBs is endoscopic removal. Endoscopy should be carried out whenever the trained personnel are available, the instruments are checked, and when the techniques have been tested. The delay in the removal of FBs is potentially harmful. The communication between the endoscopist and the anaesthesiologist is essential before the procedure to establish the plan of action; full cooperation is important and improves the outcome of endoscopy.
Conclusions:
Ingestion and or aspiration of FB in children are multifactorial in their aetiology, in their broad spectrum of different resolutions for the same FB and in the response of each patient to the treatment. Prevention remains the best treatment, implying an increased education of parents on age-appropriate foods and household items, and strict industry standards regarding the dimensions of toy parts and their secure containers.
Related Concept Videos
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation V: Advanced Airway Management Techniques
Esophageal Perforation-II: Clinical Manifestations and Management
Clinical Manifestations:
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation II: ACLS Airway Management
Esophageal Strictures-II: Clinical Features and Management
Healthcare providers should gather a comprehensive medical history and conduct a physical examination for diagnosis. If esophageal stricture is...
Trachea
Anatomical Features:
Location: About half of the trachea is situated in the neck, anterior to the esophagus, and extends from the larynx (at the level of the...
Barrett Esophagus-II: Clinical Manifestations and Management
To diagnose Barrett's esophagus, healthcare providers often recommend an endoscopy for those showing symptoms of acid reflux. The procedure entails...

