Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 24, 2026

An Improved Mechanical Testing Method to Assess Bone-implant Anchorage
Published on: February 10, 2014
Regular and platform switching: bone stress analysis varying implant type
Nália Cecília Gurgel-Juarez1, Erika Oliveira de Almeida, Eduardo Passos Rocha
1MSc Student in Prosthodontics, Postgraduate Center, São Leopoldo Mandic School of Dentistry, Campinas, Brazil.
Platform switching significantly impacts stress distribution in peri-implant bone, especially for external hexagon implants in cortical bone. External hexagon implants generally exhibit lower stress concentration compared to internal hexagon designs.
Area of Science:
- Biomaterials Science
- Dental Implantology
- Biomechanics
Background:
- Understanding stress distribution around dental implants is crucial for long-term success.
- Platform switching is a technique used to potentially improve soft tissue healing and esthetics.
- Finite element analysis (FEA) is a valuable tool for simulating biomechanical behavior in complex structures.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate stress distribution on peri-implant bone.
- To simulate the influence of platform switching on external and internal hexagon implants.
- To compare stress patterns between regular and platform-switched configurations using 3D FEA.
Main Methods:
- Four 3D finite element models were created: External Regular (ER), Internal Regular (IR), External Switching (ES), and Internal Switching (IS).
- Models simulated a central incisor with different external and internal hexagon implants and abutment sizes, including platform switching.
- Oblique forces were applied, and stress (principal and von Mises) and strain values were analyzed in cortical and trabecular bone.
Main Results:
- Cortical bone experienced higher stress with internal hexagon implants (IR and IS) compared to external hexagon implants (ER and ES).
- Platform switching (ES) reduced stress in cortical bone for external hexagon implants.
- External hexagon implants (ER) showed higher strain in trabecular bone compared to internal hexagon implants (IR).
Conclusions:
- Platform switching's effect on stress distribution is more pronounced in cortical bone than trabecular bone.
- External hexagon implants demonstrated lower stress concentration across both regular and platform-switched configurations compared to internal hexagon implants.
- These findings suggest external hexagon implants may offer biomechanical advantages, particularly when platform switching is employed.
Related Concept Videos
Stresses under Combined Loadings
The process begins by slicing the tube at critical points and analyzing the internal forces and stress components at these sections, focusing on the centroid. Normal stresses, generated by axial forces and bending moments, are either compressive or tensile and vary across the section from...
Normal Strain under Axial Loading
Bearing Stress
Due to the intricacy of these microforces, an average value, known as bearing stress, is often used by...
Stress: General Loading Conditions
The shearing force, possessing potential directionality within the plane of the section, is simplified into two component forces running parallel to the x and y axes.

