Registration-weighted motion correction for PET
Nikolaos Dikaios1, Tim D Fryer
1Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, UK.
Purpose:
Patient motion during a positron emission tomography (PET) scan can lead to significant resolution loss. Two of the main motion correction techniques employed to ameliorate the loss of image quality due to respiratory motion in the torso are postreconstruction registration (PRR) and motion-compensated image reconstruction (MCIR). In this study, the authors investigated whether versions of these methods that utilize registration-based weighting of the constituent respiratory gated data offer any advantage over the standard versions that use equal weighting. The registration-based weights were designed to penalize gates that were poorly registered to the reference gate.
Methods:
SimSET was used to simulate data from the NCAT phantom with six lesions added in the lung and liver. Images were reconstructed using registration-weighted PRR and MCIR algorithms, where the registration weighting was based on the mutual information (MI) of each registered gate and the reference gate. More specifically, relative to equal weighting, for which the weight for each gate is the inverse of the number of gates, the weights were increased for MI greater than the average MI and reduced for gates with MI less than the average MI. A scale factor was used to increase the range of the weights, and PRR and MCIR images were produced for a range of scale factor values.
Results:
At the optimal values of the scale factor, registration-weighted PRR produced significantly higher contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) for each lesion than PRR (p < 0.001), with average lesion CNR increasing significantly from (2.10 ± 0.05) to (2.70 ± 0.06) for 3 mm postsmoothing (p < 0.001) and from (2.03 ± 0.06) to (2.77 ± 0.05) for 6 mm postsmoothing (p < 0.001). Likewise, for MCIR registration weighting significantly increased the average CNR from (2.38 ± 0.04) to (2.62 ± 0.07) for 3 mm postsmoothing (p < 0.001) and from (2.56 ± 0.05) to (2.84 ± 0.08) for 6 mm postsmoothing (p < 0.001). These gains in lesion CNR were obtained despite corresponding reductions in signal-to-noise ratio, as expected from the use of unequal weighting of gated data with comparable variance.
Conclusions:
Registration weighting can significantly improve lesion CNR in motion corrected images, especially for PRR.
Related Concept Videos
Relative Motion Analysis using Rotating Axes
However, to express the relative position of point B relative to point A, an additional frame of reference, denoted as x'y', is necessary. This additional frame not only translates but also rotates relative to the fixed frame, making it instrumental in...
Relative Motion Analysis - Velocity
When an external force is exerted, it sets the crank into a rotational movement. This, in turn, instigates the motion of the connecting rod, leading to what is referred to as a general plane motion. This process involves two key points - point A on the connecting rod...
Absolute Motion Analysis- General Plane Motion
As the drone's propellers rotate, an upward force is generated that counteracts the force of gravity, enabling the drone to lift off from the ground. This initial movement of the drone is along a straight path, representing a form of translational motion. In this phase, every point on the drone...
Planar Rigid-Body Motion
Planar motion is typically divided into three distinct categories. The first is rectilinear translation, demonstrated by a subway train that moves along...
Relative Motion Analysis - Acceleration
Relative Motion Analysis using Rotating Axes - Acceleration
Time differentiation is...


