Optimizing preprocessing and analysis pipelines for single-subject fMRI: 2. Interactions with ICA, PCA, task contrast
Nathan W Churchill1, Grigori Yourganov, Anita Oder
1Department of Medical Biophysics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. nchurchill@rotman-baycrest.on.ca
Choosing the right preprocessing pipeline for functional MRI (fMRI) is crucial. Optimizing pipelines per subject improves results, especially for weaker task contrasts, and interactions with experimental design matter.
Area of Science:
- Neuroimaging
- Cognitive Neuroscience
- Data Science
Background:
- Functional MRI (fMRI) preprocessing corrects artifacts like head motion and physiological noise.
- Preprocessing pipeline choices significantly impact fMRI results.
- The interaction between preprocessing and experimental design factors is not fully understood.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate how preprocessing choices interact with between-subject heterogeneity and task contrast strength in fMRI.
- To evaluate the impact of standard preprocessing and subspace estimation techniques (PCA, ICA) on fMRI data.
- To assess the performance of individual versus fixed preprocessing pipelines.
Main Methods:
- fMRI data from young, healthy adults performing an adapted Trail-Making Test with two cognitive contrast levels.
- Standard preprocessing steps including motion correction, noise reduction, and detrending.
- Subspace estimation using Principal Component Analysis (PCA) and Independent Component Analysis (ICA).
- Performance evaluation using Penalized Discriminant Analysis, reproducibility (R), and prediction (P) metrics.
- Simulation methods to assess bias from individual-subject optimization.
Main Results:
- Individual pipeline optimization showed no significant bias compared to fixed preprocessing.
- Task contrast significantly influenced fixed pipeline performance; PCA and ICA effects varied with contrast.
- Subject-specific pipeline optimization enhanced within-subject and between-subject overlap.
- Weaker cognitive contrasts were more sensitive to pipeline optimization.
Conclusions:
- fMRI result sensitivity depends on preprocessing choices and their interaction with experimental design factors.
- Individualized preprocessing pipelines offer advantages, particularly for weak signal contrasts.
- A quantitative denoising procedure is proposed, beneficial for small-sample and clinical fMRI datasets.
More Related Videos
09:14Exploring the Neural Correlates of Cognitive Reappraisal in Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder Using Task-based Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Published on: March 14, 2025
08:36Dynamic Inter-subject Functional Connectivity Reveals Moment-to-Moment Brain Network Configurations Driven by Continuous or Communication Paradigms
Published on: March 21, 2019
