Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 24, 2026

Confocal Microscopy Reveals Cell Surface Receptor Aggregation Through Image Correlation Spectroscopy
Published on: August 2, 2018
Correlation functions quantify super-resolution images and estimate apparent clustering due to over-counting.
Sarah L Veatch1, Benjamin B Machta, Sarah A Shelby
1Department of Biophysics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States of America. sveatch@umich.edu
We developed a correlation function method to quantify clustering in microscopy images. This method corrects for over-counting labels, revealing true molecular clustering in cell membranes and improving image resolution analysis.
Area of Science:
- Biophysics
- Cell Biology
- Microscopy
Background:
- Cell membranes exhibit complex protein and lipid distributions.
- Super-resolution fluorescence microscopy and electron microscopy are key tools for probing membrane heterogeneity.
- Quantifying molecular clustering is crucial for understanding cellular processes.
Purpose of the Study:
- To present an analytical method using correlation functions to quantify clustering in 2D super-resolution fluorescence localization and electron microscopy images.
- To quantify the contribution of over-counting labeled molecules to apparent self-clustering.
- To calculate the effective lateral resolution of images and analyze molecular distributions in cell membranes.
Main Methods:
- Utilized pair auto-correlation and cross-correlation functions to analyze image data.
- Applied the method to quantify the distribution of the IgE receptor (FcεRI) on RBL-2H3 mast cell membranes.
- Employed stochastic optical reconstruction microscopy (STORM/dSTORM) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) for image acquisition.
Main Results:
- Apparent clustering from over-counting varies inversely with surface density and does not depend on the number of counts per molecule.
- Over-counting does not cause apparent co-clustering in double-label experiments.
- Correcting for over-counting revealed weak but significant self-clustering of FcεRI in fluorescence data, but none in SEM data.
Conclusions:
- The developed correlation function method accurately quantifies molecular clustering and corrects for over-counting artifacts in microscopy.
- Over-counting significantly contributes to apparent FcεRI clustering in fluorescence imaging, an effect mitigated by cross-correlation analysis.
- The method provides a robust approach to analyze membrane heterogeneity and molecular distributions using advanced imaging techniques.
Related Concept Videos
Calibration Curves: Correlation Coefficient
Super-resolution Fluorescence Microscopy
Correlation and Regression
Coefficient of Correlation
If you suspect a linear relationship between x and y, then r can measure how strong the linear relationship is.
What the VALUE of r tells us:
The value of r is always between –1 and +1: –1 ≤ r ≤ 1.
The size of the correlation r indicates the strength of the linear...
2D NMR: Overview of Heteronuclear Correlation Techniques
Calculating and Interpreting the Linear Correlation Coefficient

