Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 24, 2026

Using Visual and Narrative Methods to Achieve Fair Process in Clinical Care
Published on: February 16, 2011
What matters to users of services? An explorative study to promote shared decision making in health care
Kath Padgett1, Christine Rhodes, Maureen Lumb
1Head of Division, University of HuddersfieldHead of Undergraduate Nursing/Senior Lecturer, Child Nursing, University of Huddersfield, Huddersfield, EnglandPatient Voice Group, West Yorkshire Service User and Carer Collaborative, Hosted by Leeds University, LeedsSoon to be appointed Education Lead, Professional support Unit, London Deanery, London, EnglandHead of School of Health and Community Studies, Leeds Metropolitan UniversityPatient and Public Involvement Manager, Leeds Institute of Medical Education,\ Leeds University, Leeds, England.
Background:
Involving service users and carers in decisions about their health care is a key feature of health-care practice. Professional health and social care students need to develop skills and attributes to best enable this to happen.
Aims:
The aims were to explore service user and carer perceptions of behaviours, attributes and context required to enable shared decision making; to compare these perceptions to those of students and academic staff with a view to utilizing the findings to inform the development of student assessment tools.
Methods:
A mixed methods approach was used including action learning groups (ALG) and an iterative process alongside a modified Delphi survey.
Participants:
The ALGs were from an existing service user and carer network. The survey was sent to sixty students, sixty academics and 30 service users from 16 different professional disciplines, spanning four Universities in England.
Results:
The collaborative enquiry process and survey identified general agreement that being open and honest, listening, showing respect, giving time and being up to date were important. The qualitative findings identified that individual interpretation was a key factor. An unexpected result was an insight into possible insecurities of students.
Conclusions:
The findings indicate that distilling rich qualitative information into a format for student assessment tools could be problematic as the individual context could be lost, it is therefore proposed that the information could be better used as a learning rather than assessment tool. Several of those involved identified how they valued the process and found it beneficial.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Patient-centered Care
Ethical Dilemmas II
Decision Making: P-value Method
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses: a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can have a...
Ethical Issues
Ethical Concerns in Healthcare:
Methods of Documentation VI: Case Management Model
For example, a patient with a chronic illness...
Standards of Care II

