Psychiatric diagnoses in legal systems: an issue of validity
Graham W Mellsop1, Kate Diesfel
1Waikato Clinical School of the University of Auckland, New Zealand. graham.mellsop@waikatodhb.health.nz
Abstract:
When considering psychiatric evidence, justice systems from many countries are frequently presented with diagnostic labels from official psychiatric classificatory systems. A lack of validity in much of these classificatory systems is receiving increasing attention. Illustrative examples include post-traumatic stress disorder, various personality disorders and dissociative identity disorder. The courts and review bodies from many jurisdictions place tremendous faith in the present categorical classifications (e.g., DSMIV and ICD10). This paper questions whether the reliance on these classifications systems is appropriate in legal proceedings.
Related Concept Videos
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM)
Psychosurgery
Historical Development of Psychosurgery
In the 1930s, Portuguese neurologist Antonio Egas Moniz introduced a surgical procedure designed...
Reliability and Validity
Formulating and Validating Nursing Diagnosis II
Risk nursing diagnoses represent clinical judgments of an individual, family, or community more vulnerable to developing the health problem than others...
Theoretical Approaches to Psychological Disorder
Biological approach
The biological approach posits that internal, organic factors are the primary causes of such disorders. This perspective emphasizes brain structure and function, genetic predispositions, and neurotransmitter imbalances. For example, schizophrenia has been associated with both genetic...
Formulating and Validating Nursing Diagnosis I
There are thirteen domains for...

