Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 24, 2026

09:34
Structured Motor Rehabilitation After Selective Nerve Transfers
Published on: August 15, 2019
Reconstruction after robotic head and neck surgery: when and why
Evan A Longfield1, F Christopher Holsinger, Jesse C Selber
1Department of Head and Neck Surgery, University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas 77030, USA.
Journal of Reconstructive Microsurgery
|March 9, 2012
Summary
Transoral robotic surgery (TORS) offers organ preservation for head and neck cancer. This review explores robotic-assisted reconstruction following TORS, providing an algorithm for determining reconstruction needs.
Area of Science:
- Surgical Oncology
- Robotic Surgery
- Head and Neck Surgery
Background:
- Robotically assisted surgery has revolutionized oncologic resection, aiming to reduce patient morbidity without compromising outcomes.
- Transoral robotic surgery (TORS) is a key advancement, enabling organ-preserving resection of head and neck tumors via the da Vinci surgical system.
- TORS facilitates tumor removal without external incisions, potentially sparing patients adjuvant treatments and improving upon traditional transoral techniques.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review the current literature on TORS reconstruction in head and neck cancer surgery.
- To focus on patient selection, tumor size, and location as critical factors for reconstruction.
- To propose an algorithmic approach for determining the necessity of robotic-assisted reconstruction after TORS.
Main Methods:
- Comprehensive review of existing literature pertaining to TORS reconstruction.
- Analysis of patient selection criteria, tumor characteristics (size and location), and prior treatments.
- Inclusion of the authors' experience with 20 TORS procedures involving robotic-assisted reconstructions.
Main Results:
- The literature thus far has primarily focused on the feasibility, safety, and implementation of robotic assistance in TORS reconstruction.
- Clear guidelines for when reconstruction is warranted after TORS are currently lacking.
- The authors' experience and literature review inform an algorithmic approach based on tumor factors and patient specifics.
Conclusions:
- As TORS is increasingly used for larger tumors, robotic-assisted reconstruction is becoming a crucial part of the surgical paradigm.
- An algorithmic approach considering tumor location, extent, prior treatment, and patient-specific factors can guide reconstruction decisions.
- Further research and guideline development are needed to standardize the application of robotic-assisted reconstruction in TORS.

