Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 24, 2026

06:35
Examining Recall Memory in Infancy and Early Childhood Using the Elicited Imitation Paradigm
Published on: April 28, 2016
Belief inhibition in children's reasoning: memory-based evidence
1Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, University of Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium. sara.steegen@ppw.kuleuven.be
Journal of Experimental Child Psychology
|March 10, 2012
Summary
Adolescents use inhibitory control to override intuitive beliefs when solving logic problems. Successful reasoning leads to reduced memory access for conflicting intuitive thoughts, demonstrating cognitive control development.
Area of Science:
- Cognitive Psychology
- Developmental Psychology
- Neuroscience
Background:
- Adult reasoning relies on inhibiting intuitive beliefs conflicting with logic.
- Understanding this inhibitory process in adolescents is crucial for cognitive development research.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate belief inhibition during reasoning in adolescents (12-17 years old).
- To adapt a memory field procedure for studying cognitive inhibition in younger reasoners.
Main Methods:
- Utilized a lexical decision task to assess memory accessibility of beliefs.
- Beliefs were cued during syllogistic reasoning problems.
- Examined memory access for words linked to misleading beliefs after correct/incorrect syllogism solutions.
Main Results:
- Impaired memory access for words related to misleading beliefs was observed.
- This impairment occurred when adolescents solved syllogisms correctly.
- Suggests inhibitory processing is engaged when logic conflicts with intuition.
Conclusions:
- Correct reasoning in adolescents involves inhibiting conflicting intuitive beliefs.
- Findings support the role of inhibitory control in developing logical reasoning skills.
- The study demonstrates the applicability of memory-based tasks to assess cognitive inhibition in youth.
Related Concept Videos
Revisionist Views of Adolescent and Adult Cognition
A revisionist approach to Jean Piaget's theory of cognitive development has brought new insights that challenge and reinterpret his established ideas. Piaget proposed that the formal operational stage, emerging in adolescence, represents the culmination of cognitive maturity. During this stage, individuals are said to develop abstract thinking, engage in systematic problem-solving, and show a form of egocentrism, believing others are as preoccupied with their behavior as they are themselves.
Piaget's Stage 2 of Cognitive Development
The preoperational stage, the second of Jean Piaget's four stages of cognitive development, spans approximately ages 2 to 7 and is characterized by the emergence of symbolic thinking. During this stage, children use language, images, and symbols to represent objects and concepts, enabling them to engage in imaginative and pretend play. This symbolic thinking supports children's ability to perform make-believe actions, such as imagining a broom as a horse or their hand as a phone, blending...
Reason and Intuition
The human brain processes information for decision-making using one of two routes: an intuitive system and a rational system (Epstein, 1994; popularized by Kahneman, 2011 as System 1 and System 2, respectively). The intuitive system is quick, impulsive, and operates with minimal effort, relying on emotions or habits to provide cues for what to do next, while the rational system is logical, analytical, deliberate, and methodical. Research in neuropsychology suggests that the brain can only use...
False Memories
False memories represent a cognitive distortion in which individuals recall events that did not happen, or remember them in an altered form. This phenomenon highlights the brain's constructive nature in processing and recalling memories, emphasizing that memory is not a perfect representation of past events but rather a dynamic reconstruction influenced by various factors.
One primary source of false memories is misattribution, where individuals incorrectly associate external information with...
One primary source of false memories is misattribution, where individuals incorrectly associate external information with...
Eyewitness Memory
Eyewitness memory refers to the recollection of events by someone who has directly witnessed them, often serving as critical evidence in legal settings. This type of memory is commonly used in criminal cases where a witness describes details like a suspect's appearance, clothing, or behavior during a crime. However, despite its perceived reliability, eyewitness memory is prone to significant errors.
One such error is memory distortion, which occurs because human memory does not function like a...
One such error is memory distortion, which occurs because human memory does not function like a...
Inductive Reasoning
Inductive reasoning is a form of logical thinking that uses related observations to arrive at a general conclusion. It is uncertain and operates in degrees to which the conclusions are credible. As such, inductive arguments can be weak or strong, rather than valid or invalid, and conclusions can be used to formulate testable, falsifiable hypotheses.
Inductive reasoning is common in descriptive science. A life scientist makes observations and records them. This data can be qualitative or...
Inductive reasoning is common in descriptive science. A life scientist makes observations and records them. This data can be qualitative or...

