Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 24, 2026

Closed Chest Biventricular Pressure-Volume Loop Recordings with Admittance Catheters in a Porcine Model
Published on: May 18, 2021
AV interval optimization using pressure volume loops in dual chamber pacemaker patients with maintained systolic left
Frank Eberhardt1, Thorsten Hanke, Joern Fitschen
1Medical Clinic II, University of Luebeck, Luebeck, Germany. eberhardt@evkk.de
Insights
Optimizing the atrioventricular (AV) interval in dual-chamber pacemaker patients with preserved left ventricular function significantly improves hemodynamic performance. This optimization yields substantial gains in stroke work and reduces systolic dyssynchrony, even in patients with long-term pacing.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Biomedical Engineering
- Medical Device Optimization
Background:
- Atrioventricular (AV) interval optimization is often overlooked in dual-chamber pacemaker patients with preserved left ventricular (LV) function due to time constraints.
- Consequently, most patients remain on their default AV interval settings.
Purpose of the Study:
- To precisely measure the hemodynamic benefits of AV interval optimization in patients with chronic dual-chamber pacing and maintained LV function.
- To assess the impact of AV interval optimization on stroke work and systolic dyssynchrony.
Main Methods:
- Nineteen patients with chronic dual-chamber pacing and ejection fraction >45% underwent invasive hemodynamic assessment using a pressure-volume catheter.
- The AV interval was systematically adjusted in 10 ms increments from 80 to 300 ms, with pressure-volume loops recorded during breath-holds.
Main Results:
- AV interval optimization resulted in an average improvement in stroke work of 935 ± 760 mmHg/ml (14 ± 9% increase; p < 0.001).
- A 10 ms change in AV interval altered average stroke work by 207 ± 162 mmHg/ml.
- Optimization also led to significant improvements in systolic dyssynchrony indices (p = 0.01).
Conclusions:
- The hemodynamic improvements achieved through AV interval optimization are comparable to those seen in cardiac resynchronization therapy for certain parameters.
- The benefits of AV interval optimization are evident even in patients who have been receiving pacing for several years.
Background:
Atrioventricular (AV) interval optimization is often deemed too time-consuming in dual-chamber pacemaker patients with maintained LV function. Thus the majority of patients are left at their default AV interval.
Objective:
To quantify the magnitude of hemodynamic improvement following AV interval optimization in chronically paced dual chamber pacemaker patients.
Patients And Methods:
A pressure volume catheter was placed in the left ventricle of 19 patients with chronic dual chamber pacing and an ejection fraction >45 % undergoing elective coronary angiography. AV interval was varied in 10 ms steps from 80 to 300 ms, and pressure volume loops were recorded during breath hold.
Results:
The average optimal AV interval was 152 ± 39 ms compared to 155 ± 8 ms for the average default AV interval (range 100-240 ms). The average improvement in stroke work following AV interval optimization was 935 ± 760 mmHg/ml (range 0-2,908; p < 0.001), which translates into an average improvement of 14 ± 9 % (range 0-28). A 10 ms variation of the AV interval changes the average stroke work by 207 ± 162 mmHg/ml. AV interval optimization also leads to improved systolic dyssynchrony indices (17.7 ± 7.0 vs. 19.4 ± 7.1 %; p = 0.01).
Conclusion:
The overall hemodynamic effect of AV interval optimization in patients with maintained LV function is in the same range as for patients undergoing cardiac resynchronization therapy for several parameters. The positive effect of AV interval optimization also applies to patients who have been chronically paced for years.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Mitral Regurgitation III: Medical Management
Aortic Regurgitation III: Medical Management

