Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Improving Translational Accuracy02:07

Improving Translational Accuracy

Base complementarity between the three base pairs of mRNA codon and the tRNA anticodon is not a failsafe mechanism. Inaccuracies can range from a single mismatch to no correct base pairing at all. The free energy difference between the correct and nearly correct base pairs can be as small as 3 kcal/ mol. With complementarity being the only proofreading step, the estimated error frequency would be one wrong amino acid in every 100 amino acids incorporated. However, error frequencies observed in...
Improving Translational Accuracy02:07

Improving Translational Accuracy

Base complementarity between the three base pairs of mRNA codon and the tRNA anticodon is not a failsafe mechanism. Inaccuracies can range from a single mismatch to no correct base pairing at all. The free energy difference between the correct and nearly correct base pairs can be as small as 3 kcal/ mol. With complementarity being the only proofreading step, the estimated error frequency would be one wrong amino acid in every 100 amino acids incorporated. However, error frequencies observed in...
Self-Evaluation Maintenance Model01:29

Self-Evaluation Maintenance Model

The Self-Evaluation Maintenance (SEM) model offers a psychological framework to understand how individuals’ self-esteem is influenced by the achievements of others, particularly those with whom they share close personal bonds. The SEM model operates when personal rather than social identity guides individuals. Central to this model is the notion that individuals have an inherent desire to preserve a favorable self-image, which is continuously shaped by interpersonal comparisons and...
Reliability and Validity01:29

Reliability and Validity

Reliability and validity are two important considerations that must be made with any type of data collection. Reliability refers to the ability to consistently produce a given result. In the context of psychological research, this would mean that any instruments or tools used to collect data do so in consistent, reproducible ways.
Replication in Eukaryotes02:31

Replication in Eukaryotes

Overview
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches01:23

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Reading the room: Children integrate multiple social factors to predict and interpret objects' locations.

Child development·2026
Same author

Sounds of Hidden Agents: The Development of Causal Reasoning About Musical Sounds.

Developmental science·2025
Same author

Societal inferences from the physical world.

The Behavioral and brain sciences·2025
Same author

Using games to understand the mind.

Nature human behaviour·2024
Same author

Don't let perfect be the enemy of better: In defense of unparameterized megastudies.

The Behavioral and brain sciences·2024
Same author

Aesthetic Motivation Impacts Judgments of Others' Prosociality and Mental Life.

Open mind : discoveries in cognitive science·2023
Same journal

Learning under constraints: a theoretical framework for comparing resource-constrained learning in biological and artificial systems.

Frontiers in computational neuroscience·2026
Same journal

MsGCN: a multi-stream graph convolutional network for multiband PLV graph fusion in EEG-based biometric identification.

Frontiers in computational neuroscience·2026
Same journal

AI-driven neuroanalytic modeling for mental health: multichannel CNN-based autism spectrum disorder detection via facial pattern analysis.

Frontiers in computational neuroscience·2026
Same journal

Modeling multiscale neural dynamics for EEG-based emotion recognition using an attentive wavelet-transformer framework.

Frontiers in computational neuroscience·2026
Same journal

New directions for complex systems in contemporary neuroscience: a morphodynamic and emergent function approach.

Frontiers in computational neuroscience·2026
Same journal

NMDA receptor kinetics drive distinct routes to chaotic firing in pyramidal neurons.

Frontiers in computational neuroscience·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 24, 2026

Improving Reproducibility to Meet Minimal Information for Studies of Extracellular Vesicles 2018 Guidelines in Nanoparticle Tracking Analysis
08:52

Improving Reproducibility to Meet Minimal Information for Studies of Extracellular Vesicles 2018 Guidelines in Nanoparticle Tracking Analysis

Published on: November 17, 2021

Tracking replicability as a method of post-publication open evaluation.

Joshua K Hartshorne1, Adena Schachner

  • 1Department of Psychology, Harvard University Cambridge, MA, USA.

Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience
|March 10, 2012
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

To improve scientific reliability, we propose tracking research replications. A new system using a database and open-access journal will evaluate findings, incentivizing trustworthy scientific publications.

Keywords:
open evaluationpost-publication evaluationreplicabilityreplication

More Related Videos

The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score (PRIUS): A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time
06:05

The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score (PRIUS): A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time

Published on: February 19, 2021

Rup (RNA-seq Usability Assessment Pipeline) - Quality Control for Bulk RNA-seq Experiments in Eukaryotes
05:07

Rup (RNA-seq Usability Assessment Pipeline) - Quality Control for Bulk RNA-seq Experiments in Eukaryotes

Published on: November 7, 2025

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 24, 2026

Improving Reproducibility to Meet Minimal Information for Studies of Extracellular Vesicles 2018 Guidelines in Nanoparticle Tracking Analysis
08:52

Improving Reproducibility to Meet Minimal Information for Studies of Extracellular Vesicles 2018 Guidelines in Nanoparticle Tracking Analysis

Published on: November 17, 2021

The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score (PRIUS): A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time
06:05

The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score (PRIUS): A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time

Published on: February 19, 2021

Rup (RNA-seq Usability Assessment Pipeline) - Quality Control for Bulk RNA-seq Experiments in Eukaryotes
05:07

Rup (RNA-seq Usability Assessment Pipeline) - Quality Control for Bulk RNA-seq Experiments in Eukaryotes

Published on: November 7, 2025

Area of Science:

  • Scientific publishing
  • Research integrity
  • Bibliometrics

Background:

  • Growing concerns regarding the reliability of published scientific results.
  • Current evaluation metrics (publications, citations) do not account for result replicability.
  • Existing incentives may inadvertently favor controversial or false findings.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To propose a novel system for evaluating scientific findings based on replicability.
  • To address the limitations of current publication and citation-based metrics.
  • To incentivize the publication and recognition of reliable research.

Main Methods:

  • Establishing a database to link studies that replicate one another.
  • Creating a dedicated open-access journal for publishing replication attempts.
  • Implementing crowd-sourcing and peer review for data quality assurance.

Main Results:

  • The proposed system enables the calculation of replicability scores.
  • These scores can supplement citation counts for evaluating research quality.
  • A detailed implementation plan is provided, including community engagement strategies.

Conclusions:

  • Tracking scientific replications is crucial for enhancing research reliability.
  • A shift in the incentive structure of scientific publishing is necessary.
  • The proposed database and journal system offers a practical solution for post-publication evaluation.