Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

All-inside meniscal repair devices and techniques.

Jeff Tuman1, Marc S Haro, Sarah Foley

  • 1UVA Department of Orthopedic Surgery, 500 Ray C Hunt Drive, Box 800159, Charlottesville, VA 22908, USA.

Expert Review of Medical Devices
|March 13, 2012
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

5-Year Results of an Implantable Shock Absorber Demonstrate Durable Outcomes in Patients with Medial Knee Osteoarthritis.

JB & JS open access·2026
Same author

REASON CP: a systems-based framework for clinical reasoning to support participation across the lifespan in childhood-onset neurodisability.

Frontiers in public health·2026
Same author

Do time management interventions support wellbeing in the workplace? A systematic review.

Applied psychology. Health and well-being·2026
Same author

Measuring Menstrual Health Literacy: Development and validation of the Menstrual Health Literacy Scale.

Journal of health psychology·2026
Same author

Usability testing of the Pathway app: engaging stakeholders to improve access to mental health support for students.

Frontiers in digital health·2025
Same author

Students' attitudes and experiences toward mental health support services in Ireland: A qualitative study.

PloS one·2025

Advancements in all-inside meniscal repair devices have progressed through four generations, each addressing limitations of the previous. Current fourth-generation devices offer flexibility and adjustable compression for improved meniscal repair outcomes.

Area of Science:

  • Orthopedic Surgery
  • Biomaterials Science

Background:

  • Meniscal repair techniques are evolving, with a focus on all-inside devices.
  • Early all-inside devices faced technical challenges and risks.
  • Subsequent generations aimed to improve safety, efficacy, and usability.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review the evolution of all-inside meniscal repair devices.
  • To compare the characteristics and limitations of different device generations.
  • To highlight the potential for future development in all-inside meniscal repair technology.

Main Methods:

  • Review of first, second, third, and fourth-generation all-inside meniscal repair devices.
  • Analysis of device design, technical aspects, safety, and complication rates.
  • Discussion of the progression from early designs to current flexible, suture-based systems.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • First-generation devices were simple but technically difficult.
  • Second-generation devices utilized suture anchors, demonstrating safety.
  • Third-generation devices using rigid, bioabsorbable materials had higher failure rates and limited adjustability.
  • Fourth-generation devices are flexible, suture-based, and allow variable compression and retensioning.

Conclusions:

  • Understanding the nuances of current all-inside devices is crucial for continued innovation.
  • Future development should focus on creating safer, more effective, user-friendly, and cost-effective devices.
  • Ongoing research can further enhance all-inside meniscal repair success rates.