Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 24, 2026

Synergizing Antegrade Endoscopic with Bridging Vein Harvesting for Improvement of Great Saphenous Vein Graft Quality from the Lower Leg
Published on: November 19, 2019
Current status of endoscopic vein harvest in cardiac and peripheral vascular surgery
Kimberly Dao1, Rafael D Malgor, JoAnn Montecalvo
1School of Medicine, SUNY, Stony Brook, NY, USA.
Insights
Endoscopic vein harvest (EVH) reduces surgical complications but may impact bypass graft patency. This review examines studies comparing EVH to open vein harvest for long-term graft success.
Area of Science:
- Vascular Surgery
- Graft Patency Studies
- Minimally Invasive Techniques
Background:
- Endoscopic vein harvest (EVH) offers reduced wound morbidity compared to open vein harvest for bypass procedures.
- Long-term success of bypass surgery relies heavily on the patency of the harvested vein conduit.
- Conflicting evidence exists regarding the long-term patency rates of grafts harvested via EVH versus open techniques.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review and synthesize findings on the long-term patency of saphenous vein grafts obtained through EVH compared to open vein harvest.
- To explore potential biological and functional reasons for discrepancies in graft patency between the two harvesting methods.
- To evaluate clinical outcomes, including wound complications and graft patency, for both EVH and open vein harvest in coronary and lower extremity bypass.
Main Methods:
- Literature review of microscopic, electron microscopic, and functional studies on venous endothelium and vein contractile function.
- Analysis of clinical data comparing early wound complications and short- to long-term patency rates for EVH and open vein harvest.
- Synthesis of results from studies investigating the biological mechanisms potentially affecting graft patency.
Main Results:
- Studies suggest potentially decreased long-term patency rates with EVH compared to open vein harvest.
- Microscopic and functional studies have yielded conflicting results regarding endothelial and contractile function of EVH conduits.
- Clinical outcomes regarding wound complications and patency rates require careful consideration of harvesting methods.
Conclusions:
- While EVH offers advantages in wound healing, its impact on long-term bypass graft patency remains a critical area of investigation.
- Further research is needed to elucidate the mechanisms behind potential patency differences and optimize EVH techniques.
- The choice between EVH and open vein harvest should balance early wound benefits against potential long-term conduit performance.
Abstract:
Endoscopic harvesting of the saphenous vein (EVH) has been shown to minimize the morbidity associated with saphenous vein harvest for either coronary artery bypass or lower extremity bypass. However, the long-term benefit of a bypass procedure is predicated on conduit patency. Several studies suggest decreased patency with EVH compared with open vein harvest. Possible reasons for this discrepancy have been investigated by microscopic, electron microscopic, and functional studies of venous endothelium and contractile function of harvested veins with conflicting results. This review details the results of these studies. In addition, the clinical results of coronary bypass graft and lower extremity bypass with open vein harvest and EVH are described in regard to early wound complications and short- and long-term patency.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Varicose Veins II: Diagnostic Studies and Interprofessional Care
Peripheral Artery Disease V: Postoperative Nursing Management
Esophageal Varices-II: Clinical Features and Management
In the initial assessment, a thorough review of the patient's medical history is vital to identify risk factors such as liver disease, alcohol abuse, or...

