Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 24, 2026
05:14
Comparison of Agreement and Accuracy using Binocular Wavefront Optometer with Autorefractor and Phoropter
Published on: September 16, 2025
Comparison of optical vortex detection methods for use with a Shack-Hartmann wavefront sensor.
1Applied Optics Group, School of Physics, National University of Ireland, Galway, Ireland. kevmurphy85@gmail.com
Optics Express
|March 16, 2012
Summary
This study experimentally compares two optical vortex detection methods using Shack-Hartmann wavefront sensor data. The vortex potential method proved more successful than the contour sum method for locating vortices in turbulent fields.
Area of Science:
- Optical physics
- Wavefront sensing
Background:
- Optical vortices are crucial in various scientific fields.
- Accurate detection of optical vortices is essential for analyzing light fields.
Purpose of the Study:
- To experimentally compare the performance of two vortex detection methods: vortex potential and contour sum.
- To determine the more effective method for detecting optical vortices in turbulent fields using Shack-Hartmann wavefront sensor data.
Main Methods:
- Experimental generation of turbulent optical fields with vortices using a spatial light modulator (SLM).
- Detection of these fields using a Shack-Hartmann wavefront sensor (SHWFS).
- Analysis of SHWFS data using both the vortex potential and contour sum methods.
Main Results:
- Both vortex potential and contour sum methods were applied to analyze experimental data.
- The vortex potential method demonstrated higher success rates in locating optical vortices.
Conclusions:
- The vortex potential method is superior for detecting optical vortices in turbulent fields captured by a Shack-Hartmann wavefront sensor.
- This finding has implications for advanced optical metrology and characterization.
