Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 24, 2026

Experimental Paradigm for Measuring the Effect of Induced Emotion on Grammar Learning
Published on: January 29, 2020
A comparison of automatic and human speech recognition in null grammar
1Think A Move, Ltd., Beachwood, Ohio 44122, USA. amjuneja@gmail.com
Abstract:
The accuracy of automatic speech recognition (ASR) systems is generally evaluated using corpora of grammatically sound read speech or natural spontaneous speech. This prohibits an accurate estimation of the performance of the acoustic modeling part of ASR because the language modeling performance is inherently integrated in the overall performance metric. In this work, ASR and human speech recognition (HSR) accuracies are compared for null grammar sentences in different signal-to-noise ratios and vocabulary sizes-1000, 2000, 4000, and 8000. The results shed light on differences between ASR and HSR in relative significance of bottom-up word recognition and context awareness.
Related Concept Videos
Automatic Processing and Automatic Social Behavior
Null and Alternative Hypotheses
The null hypothesis, denoted by H0 is a statement of no difference between the variables—they are not related. This can often be considered the status quo. As a result if you cannot accept the null, it requires some action.
The alternative hypothesis, denoted by H1 or Ha, is a claim about the population that is...
Components of Language
Detection of Gross Error: The Q Test
Language and Cognition
Nonsense-mediated mRNA Decay
Usually, Upf3 binds to an Exon Junction Complex (EJC) at mRNA splice sites. If a ribosome fully translates the mRNA,...
