Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 24, 2026

Curtain Flow Column: Optimization of Efficiency and Sensitivity
Published on: June 12, 2016
Pareto-optimality study into the comparison of the separation potential of comprehensive two-dimensional liquid
Dominique J D Vanhoutte1, Gabriel Vivó-Truyols, Peter J Schoenmakers
1Analytical-Chemistry Group, Van't Hoff Institute for Molecular Sciences, University of Amsterdam, P.O. Box 94157, 1090 GD Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Abstract:
The expected performance of spatial ("flat-bed") two-dimensional liquid chromatography ((x)LC×(x)LC) has been calculated using the Pareto-optimality strategy. This approach allowed different objectives (total peak capacity, total analysis time, and total dilution) to be considered simultaneously and to establish optimal parameters (pressure drop, particle size, bed length, and initial spot size). The performance of spatial two-dimensional chromatographic systems was compared with that of conventional on-line, real-time two-dimensional column-liquid-chromatography systems ((t)LC×(t)LC). The potential gain in peak capacity and/or analysis time of the spatial configuration was confirmed. By restricting the spatial parameters to realistic chromatographic conditions (limiting the stress, as counterbalance for the pressure drop through the sorbent bed, to 2500 kg) it was found that (x)LC×(x)LC is attractive for very fast analysis of complex samples, rather than for extremely efficient separations. For example, a peak capacity of 780 may be achieved in only 2.7 min using a 100×100 mm sorbent bed of a quality currently encountered thin-layer chromatography. Furthermore, if beds can be packed as efficiently as contemporary columns, the predicted peak capacity increases to around 1000, corresponding to a peak-production rate of about 6.3 peaks/s. Possibilities to boost the performance of (x)LC×(x)LC further are briefly discussed. Unless we can overcome the severe stress requirements of high-performance (x)LC×(x)LC, conventional (t)LC×(t)LC may be more amenable to very complex separations, thanks to the very high peak capacities. However, (t)LC×(t)LC separations will require long analysis times (e.g. 10,000 peaks in 37 h, corresponding to 0.075 peaks/s at a pressure drop of 40 MPa). The best trade-off between total peak capacity, total analysis time, and total dilution under restricted (realistic) conditions was obtained using high pressures, small chromatographic beds, small particles, and relatively large sample spots.
Related Concept Videos
Optimizing Chromatographic Separations
Band broadening refers to spreading solute bands as they travel through the column. This broadening can impact resolution. Plate height (H) represents the length required for one theoretical plate. A lower plate height corresponds to...
High-Performance Liquid Chromatography: Introduction
In HPLC, two phases play a critical role in the separation process:
Principles Of Column Chromatography
Gas Chromatography: Types of Columns and Stationary Phases
For an analyte to remain on the column for a sufficient amount of time, it must exhibit some level of compatibility (or...
Chromatography: Introduction
The phase in which the compounds linger or on which the compounds adsorb is called the stationary phase, whereas the mobile phase is the solvent that carries the solutes to be analyzed. In traditional column chromatography, the mixture flows through the stationary phase, and the compounds partition between the stationary and mobile phases...
Ion-Exchange Chromatography
