Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 23, 2026

Prehospital Thrombolysis: A Manual from Berlin
Published on: November 26, 2013
Thrombolysis in cervical artery dissection--data from the Cervical Artery Dissection and Ischaemic Stroke Patients
S T Engelter1, J Dallongeville, M Kloss
1Department of Neurology, Basel University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland. sengelter@uhbs.ch
Insights
Thrombolysis for stroke from cervical artery dissection (CeAD) did not worsen outcomes or increase bleeding risk. These findings suggest that thrombolysis should not be withheld in CeAD stroke patients, though further research into more effective treatments is warranted.
Area of Science:
- Neurology
- Vascular Medicine
- Interventional Cardiology
Background:
- Cervical artery dissection (CeAD) is a significant cause of stroke in younger adults.
- The role of thrombolysis in CeAD-associated stroke remains controversial due to concerns about hemorrhage risk.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the impact of thrombolysis on outcomes and major hemorrhage rates in patients with stroke due to cervical artery dissection (CeAD).
Main Methods:
- A multicenter CeAD stroke database was used to compare patients treated with and without thrombolysis.
- Outcomes included favorable 3-month functional status (modified Rankin Scale 0-2) and major hemorrhage (intracranial or extracranial).
- Adjusted odds ratios and propensity-matched analyses were performed.
Main Results:
- Among 616 CeAD stroke patients, 68 received thrombolysis, often for more severe strokes and with higher rates of arterial occlusion.
- Thrombolysis was not independently associated with unfavorable 3-month outcomes (adjusted OR 0.95) or a significant increase in major hemorrhages (5.9% vs 0.6%).
- Propensity matching confirmed similar favorable outcome odds between thrombolyzed and non-thrombolyzed groups.
Conclusions:
- Thrombolysis in CeAD stroke is not associated with worse outcomes or excess symptomatic bleeding.
- These findings support not withholding thrombolysis in CeAD stroke patients.
- The absence of a clear benefit suggests exploring alternative treatments like mechanical revascularization.
Objective:
To examine whether thrombolysis for stroke attributable to cervical artery dissection (CeAD(Stroke) ) affects outcome and major haemorrhage rates.
Methods:
We used a multicentre CeAD(Stroke) database to compare CeAD(Stroke) patients treated with and without thrombolysis. Main outcome measures were favourable 3-month outcome (modified Rankin Scale 0-2) and 'major haemorrhage' [any intracranial haemorrhage (ICH) and major extracranial haemorrhage]. Adjusted odds ratios [OR (95% confidence intervals)] were calculated on the whole database and on propensity-matched groups.
Results:
Among 616 CeAD(Stroke) patients, 68 (11.0%) received thrombolysis; which was used in 55 (81%) intravenously. Thrombolyzed patients had more severe strokes (median NIHSS score 16 vs. 3; P < 0.001) and more often occlusion of the dissected artery (66.2% vs. 39.4%; P < 0.001). After adjustment for stroke severity and vessel occlusion, the likelihood for favourable outcome did not differ between the treatment groups [OR(adjusted) 0.95 (95% CI 0.45-2.00)]. The propensity matching score model showed that the odds to recover favourably were virtually identical for 64 thrombolyzed and 64 non-thrombolyzed-matched CeAD(Stroke) patients [OR 1.00 (0.49-2.00)]. Haemorrhages occurred in 4 (5.9%) thrombolyzed patients, all being asymptomatic ICHs. In the non-thrombolysis group, 3 (0.6%) patients had major haemorrhages [asymptomatic ICH (n = 2) and major extracranial haemorrhage (n = 1)].
Conclusion:
As thrombolysis was neither independently associated with unfavourable outcome nor with an excess of symptomatic bleedings, our findings suggest thrombolysis should not be withheld in CeAD(Stroke) patients. However, the lack of any trend towards a benefit of thrombolysis may indicate the legitimacy to search for more efficient treatment options including mechanical revascularization strategies.
Related Concept Videos
Venous Thrombosis III: Interprofessional Care
Ischemic Stroke l: Introduction

