Resident training in female sexual dysfunction: a comparison of urology and obstetrics and gynecology programs

: The study's objective was to develop a tool that would characterize and compare resident training in female sexual dysfunction (FSD).

: A questionnaire was designed. Internet distribution targeted program directors of accredited urology and obstetrics and gynecology programs (N = 351).

: Sixty-nine percent of programs did not have a standard protocol for working up patients with FSD, and 51% "rarely or never" have a faculty member with special training. Most (79%) agreed that resident training needed improvement. Barriers included lack of expert faculty, time, and resources. Obstetrics and gynecology program directors were more likely to agree with national training guidelines that promote FSD and more often encouraged residents to screen for FSD (63% vs 24%).

: Obstetrics and gynecology programs advocate FSD training more so than urology; however, both acknowledge its importance and the need for educational development.