Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 23, 2026

A Zebrafish Model of Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Memory
Published on: February 28, 2013
Glycemic control and cardiovascular disease: what's a doctor to do?
Preeti Kishore1, Sharon H Kim, Jill P Crandall
1Division of Endocrinology and Diabetes Research Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, 1300 Morris Park Avenue, Bronx, NY 10461, USA.
Insights
Intensive glycemic control in type 2 diabetes does not reduce cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk or mortality. Some studies even showed increased mortality with intensive control, challenging previous assumptions.
Area of Science:
- Endocrinology
- Cardiology
- Clinical Trials
Background:
- Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the primary cause of death in diabetes mellitus patients.
- Diabetes patients have a 2-4 times higher CVD mortality rate compared to non-diabetics.
- Near-normal blood sugar levels were previously thought to reduce CVD risk and mortality in type 2 diabetes.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review major clinical trials investigating intensive glycemic control in type 2 diabetes.
- To explore reasons for the unexpected negative results in these trials.
- To provide clinical management insights for diabetic patients.
Main Methods:
- Review of several large randomized control trials.
- Comparison of intensive glycemic control versus conventional therapy arms.
- Analysis of mortality and CVD event data.
Main Results:
- Intensive glycemic control did not show a significant advantage in reducing mortality or CVD events.
- Some trials, like ACCORD, indicated increased mortality in the intensive control group.
- The conventional approach to glycemic control may be more appropriate for reducing CVD risk.
Conclusions:
- Intensive glycemic control strategies do not improve outcomes for type 2 diabetes patients regarding CVD.
- Potential risks associated with intensive control need careful consideration.
- Clinical practice should be guided by trial evidence, focusing on individualized patient care.
Abstract:
Cardiovascular disease (CVD) remains the leading cause of morbidity and mortality in individuals with diabetes mellitus. Moreover, rates of CVD mortality are two to four times higher in diabetes than in those without diabetes. It was conventional thinking that achieving near-normoglycemia would help reduce CVD risk and overall mortality in type 2 diabetes mellitus. Several recent large trials attempted to answer this question using a randomized control trial design with a conventional therapy and an intensive control arm. Surprisingly, these trials did not demonstrate neither mortality nor a CVD advantage with intensive glycemic control. Moreover, some studies (e.g., the ACCORD [Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes] study) showed increased mortality in the intensive control arm. In this review, our goal is to summarize the findings of the major trials in this field and to explore the potential reasons for why these trials had largely negative results. We conclude with some lessons that may be applied to the clinical management of patients with diabetes.
Related Concept Videos
Atherosclerosis III: Management
Diabetes: Management and Pharmacotherapy
Insulin remains the cornerstone of treatment for most patients with type 1 and many...
Coronary Artery Disease IV: Preventive Measures
Diabetes Mellitus: Type 2 and Gestational
Angina IV: Management
Hypoglycemia and Glucagon
