Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 23, 2026

Visualization of Low-Level Gamma Radiation Sources Using a Low-Cost, High-Sensitivity, Omnidirectional Compton Camera
Published on: January 30, 2020
Interpretation of the peak areas in gamma-ray spectra that have a large relative uncertainty
M Korun1, P Maver Modec, B Vodenik
1Jožef Stefan Institute, Ljubljana, Slovenia. matjaz.korun@ijs.si
Abstract:
Empirical evidence is provided that the areas of peaks having a relative uncertainty in excess of 30% are overestimated. This systematic influence is of a statistical nature and originates in way the peak-analyzing routine recognizes the small peaks. It is not easy to detect this influence since it is smaller than the peak-area uncertainty. However, the systematic influence can be revealed in repeated measurements under the same experimental conditions, e.g., in background measurements. To evaluate the systematic influence, background measurements were analyzed with the peak-analyzing procedure described by Korun et al. (2008). The magnitude of the influence depends on the relative uncertainty of the peak area and may amount, in the conditions used in the peak analysis, to a factor of 5 at relative uncertainties exceeding 60%. From the measurements, the probability for type-II errors, as a function of the relative uncertainty of the peak area, was extracted. This probability is near zero below an uncertainty of 30% and rises to 90% at uncertainties exceeding 50%.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Propagation of Uncertainty from Systematic Error
Uncertainty: Overview
NMR Spectrometers: Resolution and Error Correction
Inductively Coupled Plasma-Mass Spectrometry (ICP-MS): Interferences
High-Resolution Mass Spectrometry (HRMS)
¹H NMR: Interpreting Distorted and Overlapping Signals
As Δν decreases and the signals move closer, the doublets appear increasingly distorted. The intensities of the inner lines increase at the cost of those of the outer lines as the signals are slanted or...

