Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Reinforcement Schedules

Reinforcement Schedules

Positive reinforcement is a powerful method for teaching new behaviors to both animals and humans. B.F. Skinner demonstrated this with his experiments using rats in a Skinner box. When a rat pressed a lever, it received a food pellet. This immediate reward encouraged the rat to repeat the behavior. This method, where a reward follows every instance of the behavior, is known as continuous reinforcement. It is highly effective for establishing new behaviors quickly.
Once a behavior is learned,...

Stress Prevention and Stress Management Techniques VI

Stress Prevention and Stress Management Techniques VI

Adopting a healthier lifestyle often requires overcoming significant challenges, but leveraging psychological, social, and cultural resources can facilitate meaningful change. Effective self-change hinges on understanding and applying key tools such as motivation and goal setting, which help sustain efforts toward long-term health benefits.
Motivation and Self-Determination
Motivation, the driving force behind behavior, plays a pivotal role at every stage of the change process. The research...

Causes of Social Behavior II: Cognitive Processes

Causes of Social Behavior II: Cognitive Processes

Cognitive processes affect social behavior by guiding how individuals perceive, interpret, and respond to social stimuli. These mental processes enable individuals to assess others' behaviors, attribute causes to their actions, and form expectations based on past experiences.Causes of Behavior and Social JudgmentsIndividuals determine the causes of others' behaviors by distinguishing between personal traits and external circumstances. For example, if a friend frequently arrives late, an...

Classical Conditioning in Daily Life

Classical Conditioning in Daily Life

Classical conditioning, a fundamental principle of associative learning, explains various phenomena observed in daily life, such as fear development, the placebo effect, taste aversion, and drug habituation. These applications demonstrate the profound impact of associative learning on human behavior and physiological responses.
John B. Watson and Rosalie Rayner famously demonstrated the development of fear through classical conditioning in their experiment with Little Albert. They paired the...

Timing and Consequences on Behavior

Timing and Consequences on Behavior

In operant conditioning, the timing of reinforcement is crucial. For animals like rats and cats, immediate reinforcement (within a few seconds) is much more effective than delayed reinforcement. For example, a food reward for a rat needs to follow within 30 seconds of pressing a bar to be effective.
Humans, however, can respond to delayed reinforcers. We often make decisions between immediate small rewards and delayed larger rewards. This ability to delay gratification is a significant factor...

Operant Conditioning Intervention

Operant Conditioning Intervention

Operant conditioning serves as a foundational principle in therapeutic interventions aimed at modifying maladaptive behaviors. Central to this approach is the notion that behaviors, both adaptive and maladaptive, are learned through reinforcement. By analyzing the environmental factors that reinforce problematic behaviors, clinicians can design interventions to weaken these reinforcements and replace maladaptive behaviors with healthier alternatives.
In operant conditioning, behaviors that are...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

The cultural plasticity of intimacy behavior: A socioecological attachment perspective.

The Behavioral and brain sciences·2026

Same author

Citation accuracy in American Psychological Association amicus curiae briefs.

The American psychologist·2025

Same author

Accuracy in amicus curiae briefs and in commentaries: Reply to Cobb et al. (2025), Dvoskin et al. (2025), and Kovera (2025).

The American psychologist·2025

Same author

A Taxometric Analysis and External Validation of the Latent Structure of Student Risks and Needs.

Assessment·2024

Same author

Daughter circumcision and maternal life satisfaction: a cultural moderation effect revealed across two multicountry studies.

BMJ global health·2024

Same author

Latent profile similarity of middle and high school youth risk and needs.

Journal of school psychology·2023

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 23, 2026

Modulation of the Neurophysiological Response to Fearful and Stressful Stimuli Through Repetitive Religious Chanting

Modulation of the Neurophysiological Response to Fearful and Stressful Stimuli Through Repetitive Religious Chanting

Published on: November 4, 2021

Religion as schedule-induced behavior.

Paul S Strand¹

¹Washington State University.

The Behavior Analyst

|April 6, 2012

Summary

This study introduces two categories of religious behavior: schedule-induced and operant. This framework helps explain diverse religious experiences and behaviors often overlooked by scientific study.

Area of Science:

Psychology of Religion
Behavioral Science
Cognitive Science

Background:

Religious behaviors are complex and often studied through philosophical or theological lenses.
Existing scientific approaches to religion may overlook nuanced aspects of religious experience.
A behavioral framework can offer new insights into the mechanisms underlying religious actions.

Purpose of the Study:

To propose a novel classification of religious behaviors based on behavioral principles.
To differentiate between nonoperant schedule-induced religious behaviors and operant religious behaviors.
To provide a framework for understanding the dichotomy between 'graceful' and 'effortful' religious experiences.

Main Methods:

Conceptual analysis of religious behaviors through the lens of schedule-induced behavior.

More Related Videos

Religious Chanting and Self-Related Brain Regions: A Multi-Modal Neuroimaging Study

Religious Chanting and Self-Related Brain Regions: A Multi-Modal Neuroimaging Study

Published on: May 31, 2024

Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation of the Posterior Medial Frontal Cortex to Experimentally Reduce Ideological Threat Responses

Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation of the Posterior Medial Frontal Cortex to Experimentally Reduce Ideological Threat Responses

Published on: September 28, 2018

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 23, 2026

Modulation of the Neurophysiological Response to Fearful and Stressful Stimuli Through Repetitive Religious Chanting

Modulation of the Neurophysiological Response to Fearful and Stressful Stimuli Through Repetitive Religious Chanting

Published on: November 4, 2021

Religious Chanting and Self-Related Brain Regions: A Multi-Modal Neuroimaging Study

Religious Chanting and Self-Related Brain Regions: A Multi-Modal Neuroimaging Study

Published on: May 31, 2024

Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation of the Posterior Medial Frontal Cortex to Experimentally Reduce Ideological Threat Responses

Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation of the Posterior Medial Frontal Cortex to Experimentally Reduce Ideological Threat Responses

Published on: September 28, 2018

Application of operant conditioning principles to religious actions.

Comparison of the proposed dichotomy with existing distinctions in religious scholarship.

Main Results:

Identification of a class of religious behaviors induced by response-independent schedules.
Proposal of two distinct classes of religious behavior: nonoperant schedule-induced and operant.
Demonstration of how this dichotomy aligns with philosophical distinctions between 'graceful' and 'effortful' religious behaviors.

Conclusions:

The proposed classification offers a new scientific perspective on religious behavior.
This framework can elucidate aspects of religious experience previously disregarded by scientific inquiry.
Understanding religious behavior as both schedule-induced and operant enriches the scientific study of religion.