Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches01:23

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...
Uncertainty: Overview00:59

Uncertainty: Overview

In analytical chemistry, we often perform repetitive measurements to detect and minimize inaccuracies caused by both determinate and indeterminate errors. Despite the cares we take, the presence of random errors means that repeated measurements almost never have exactly the same magnitude. The collective difference between these measurements - observed values - and the estimated or expected value is called uncertainty. Uncertainty is conventionally written after the estimated or expected value.
Propagation of Uncertainty from Random Error00:59

Propagation of Uncertainty from Random Error

An experiment often consists of more than a single step. In this case, measurements at each step give rise to uncertainty. Because the measurements occur in successive steps, the uncertainty in one step necessarily contributes to that in the subsequent step. As we perform statistical analysis on these types of experiments, we must learn to account for the propagation of uncertainty from one step to the next. The propagation of uncertainty depends on the type of arithmetic operation performed on...
Uncertainty: Confidence Intervals00:54

Uncertainty: Confidence Intervals

The confidence interval is the range of values around the mean that contains the true mean. It is expressed as a probability percentage. The interpretation of a 95% confidence interval, for instance, is that the statistician is 95% confident that the true mean falls within the interval. The upper and lower limits of this range are known as confidence limits. The confidence limits for the true mean are estimated from the sample's mean, the standard deviation, and the statistical factor 't,' or...
Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding01:25

Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding

Confounding is a critical issue in epidemiological studies, often leading to misleading conclusions about associations between exposures and outcomes. It occurs when the relationship between the exposure and the outcome is mixed with the effects of other factors that influence the outcome. Given that, addressing confounding is of high importance for drawing accurate inferences in research.
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
Design Example: Analyzing Capacity Contours for Flood Risk Assessment01:17

Design Example: Analyzing Capacity Contours for Flood Risk Assessment

Flood risk assessment involves careful planning and analysis to ensure the safety of communities near water retention structures. Capacity contours are a vital tool in this process, as they illustrate the potential spread of water at specific levels in a given area. In the context of building a bund across a small valley, these contours play a critical role in evaluating the safety of nearby residential areas.In this example, the bund is intended to store stormwater in the valley. The engineers...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Reducing Risk Misinformation and Miscommunication: A Sheaf-Theoretic Perspective.

Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis·2026
Same author

Necessary conditions for valid causal inference from observational data.

Critical reviews in toxicology·2026
Same author

Integrating Fragmented Risk Knowledge: Sheaf Theory for Risk Analysts.

Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis·2026
Same author

Combining Diverse Expert Opinions in Risk Analysis Using Relative Causal Knowledge.

Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis·2026
Same author

Improving the design of epidemiology studies that use biomonitoring for exposure assessment: a SciPinion panel recommendation.

BMC medical research methodology·2026
Same author

Living with risk, then and now: A dual review of Cam Grey's Living with Risk in the Late Roman World and of current AI-assisted book reviewing.

Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 23, 2026

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

Confronting deep uncertainties in risk analysis.

Louis Anthony Cox1

  • 1Associates and University of Colorado, 503 Franklin St., Denver, CO 80218, USA. tcoxdenver@aol.com

Risk Analysis : an Official Publication of the Society for Risk Analysis
|April 12, 2012
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Risk analysts can improve decisions under uncertainty using robust and adaptive methods. These novel approaches offer breakthroughs for prediction and policy when traditional models fail.

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 23, 2026

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

Area of Science:

  • Decision Analysis
  • Risk Management
  • Uncertainty Quantification

Background:

  • Addresses the challenge of improving policy and decision-making when the probabilistic relationship between actions and consequences is unknown.
  • Highlights the prevalence of model uncertainty in critical areas such as climate change preparedness, disease management, and hazardous facility operation.
  • Contrasts novel methods with traditional approaches like single "best-fitting" model identification and sensitivity analysis.

Discussion:

  • Reviews constructive methods for robust and adaptive risk analysis specifically designed for deep uncertainty.
  • Emphasizes that these advanced techniques are less familiar to risk analysts compared to established statistical and model-based methods.
  • Argues for the adoption of these methods to overcome limitations of conventional approaches.

Key Insights:

  • Robust and adaptive risk analysis methods offer genuine breakthroughs for improving predictions and decisions under high model uncertainty.
  • These methods provide practical solutions for complex risk management problems where traditional modeling is insufficient.
  • The study demonstrates the potential of these techniques through various real-world risk management applications.

Outlook:

  • Encourages wider adoption of robust and adaptive risk analysis techniques within the risk analysis community.
  • Suggests that these methods can significantly enhance the quality of policy and decision-making in the face of deep uncertainty.
  • Highlights the ongoing development and application of these advanced risk assessment tools.