Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 23, 2026

E-Patient Counseling Trial (E-PACO): Computer Based Education versus Nurse Counseling for Patients to Prepare for Colonoscopy
Published on: August 1, 2019
Quality of data entry using single entry, double entry and automated forms processing--an example based on a study of
Aksel Paulsen1, Søren Overgaard, Jens Martin Lauritsen
1Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Funen, Denmark. Aksel.Paulsen@ouh.regionsyddanmark.dk
Automated forms processing, including Optical Mark Recognition, is a valid alternative to manual double-key data entry for structured health forms. This method offers comparable accuracy to the gold standard, improving efficiency in data transfer.
Area of Science:
- Health Services Research
- Data Management
- Clinical Informatics
Background:
- Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are increasingly utilized in healthcare.
- Paper-based PROMs necessitate manual data entry, which is time-consuming.
- Automated forms processing presents a potential solution for efficient data transfer.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the accuracy of automated forms processing with manual data entry methods.
- To validate automated forms processing as an alternative to manual double-key data entry.
- To assess the efficiency of different data entry techniques for PROMs.
Main Methods:
- A cohort of 5777 patients was used, with 200 randomly selected.
- Questionnaires were processed using automated forms processing (Optical Mark Recognition, Intelligent Character Recognition) and manual single-key and double-key data entry.
- Data accuracy was measured by the proportion of correctly entered fields.
Main Results:
- Manual double-key data entry showed a low error rate (0.046/1000 fields).
- Optical Mark Recognition demonstrated no statistical difference in accuracy compared to manual double-key entry (0.046/1000 fields).
- Intelligent Character Recognition showed significantly higher error rates compared to both single and double manual entry.
Conclusions:
- Automated forms processing, specifically Optical Mark Recognition, is a valid alternative to manual double-key data entry for structured forms.
- Automated forms processing can be more accurate than single manual data entry.
- This technology offers a viable solution for efficient and accurate data capture in health services.
Related Concept Videos
Data Reporting and Recording
Data Collection III
The principles to begin the physical assessment include conducting a comprehensive or problem-related history in a quiet, well-lit room, emphasizing privacy and comfort for the patient.
Data Collection I
Methods of Documentation I: Source-Oriented Records
In an SOR, each discipline involved in patient care maintains a separate medical record section. This record-keeping method enables easy tracking of patient progress and ensures healthcare staff have access to up-to-date information.
Key Attributes include the following:
Methods of Documentation III: PIE
Documentation of Nursing Diagnosis
In some settings, data-driven computerized decision support systems are in place, allowing for more accurate nursing diagnoses. The database within one of these systems includes diagnostic labels defining characteristics, activities, and indicators for nursing. A nurse enters assessment...

