Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

The Scientific Method02:40

The Scientific Method

57.2K
Research is what makes the difference between facts and opinions. Facts are observable realities, and opinions are personal judgments, conclusions, or attitudes that may or may not be accurate. In the scientific community, facts can be established only using evidence collected through empirical research.
57.2K
Interdisciplinary Care: The Health Care Team-I01:21

Interdisciplinary Care: The Health Care Team-I

2.6K
An interdisciplinary team includes many healthcare professionals working together and utilizing their skills, knowledge, and expertise to provide holistic and quality patient care.
Physicians
The physician's primary responsibility is to diagnose illness and direct the medical or surgical treatment of the condition. The authority to admit patients to a healthcare agency or institution and practice care within that setting is granted to physicians by the healthcare agency or institution...
2.6K
Interdisciplinary Care: The Health Care Team-II01:18

Interdisciplinary Care: The Health Care Team-II

2.2K
An interdisciplinary team includes many healthcare professionals working together and utilizing their skills, knowledge, and expertise to provide holistic and quality patient care. Here are a few more healthcare professionals.
Physical Therapist
A physical therapist (PT) aims to restore function or prevent additional impairment in a patient following an injury or disease. Massage, heat, cold, water, sonar waves, exercises, and electrical stimulation are some treatments used by PTs to treat...
2.2K
Psychology as a Science01:13

Psychology as a Science

3.8K
Psychology, as a scientific discipline, aims to understand the mind and behavior through rigorous and systematic methods. The foundation of psychological research is evidence-based, relying heavily on the scientific method to derive and validate knowledge. This structured approach ensures that findings are reliable, valid, and applicable to broader contexts.
The scientific method in psychology involves six critical steps: making observations, formulating hypotheses, conducting tests, analyzing...
3.8K
Scientific Nature of Social Psychology01:30

Scientific Nature of Social Psychology

765
Social psychology is a scientific discipline dedicated to understanding how individuals think, feel, and behave in social contexts. Unlike common sense, which relies on anecdotal experiences and intuition, social psychology employs systematic research and empirical methods to ensure objectivity and reliability. This distinction is fundamental in distinguishing scientifically supported findings from mere speculation.Four fundamental scientific values guide a structured approach to research in...
765
Microbial Interactions: Cooperation01:26

Microbial Interactions: Cooperation

59
Microbial cooperation involves beneficial interactions in which different species work together for individual or mutual advantage. These interactions can profoundly influence ecological dynamics and evolutionary processes, and they are essential to many pathogenic and symbiotic relationships.Nematode–Bacteria CooperationA striking example is the relationship between the Gram-negative bacterium Xenorhabdus nematophila and the parasitic nematode Steinernema carpocapsae. Juvenile nematodes...
59

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Catalyzing collaboration through intentional design: the Teaming for Biomedical Digital Twin (Teaming4BDT) conference.

Frontiers in psychology·2026
Same author

Team effectiveness model for science (TEMS): Using a mutual learning shared mindset to design, develop, and sustain science teams.

Journal of clinical and translational science·2021
Same author

Changes in the National Cancer Institute's R01 workforce: growth, aging, retention, and policy implications.

The Journal of clinical investigation·2021
Same author

The 'Welcome Letter': A Useful Tool for Laboratories and Teams.

Journal of translational medicine & epidemiology·2017
Same author

Graduate Education for the Future: New Models and Methods for the Clinical and Translational Workforce.

Clinical and translational science·2015
Same author

The Team Science Toolkit: enhancing research collaboration through online knowledge sharing.

American journal of preventive medicine·2013

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 2, 2026

Inter-Brain Synchrony in Open-Ended Collaborative Learning: An fNIRS-Hyperscanning Study
04:44

Inter-Brain Synchrony in Open-Ended Collaborative Learning: An fNIRS-Hyperscanning Study

Published on: July 21, 2021

4.2K

Collaboration and team science: from theory to practice.

L Michelle Bennett1, Howard Gadlin

  • 1National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, MD, USA. LMBennett@nih.gov

Journal of Investigative Medicine : the Official Publication of the American Federation for Clinical Research
|April 25, 2012
PubMed
Summary

Building successful scientific research teams requires more than just a shared goal. Key elements like trust, clear communication, and strategic team building are crucial for effective collaboration and sustained success in interdisciplinary research.

More Related Videos

The Collective Trust Game: An Online Group Adaptation of the Trust Game Based on the HoneyComb Paradigm
06:18

The Collective Trust Game: An Online Group Adaptation of the Trust Game Based on the HoneyComb Paradigm

Published on: October 20, 2022

2.3K
Group Synchronization During Collaborative Drawing Using Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy
07:53

Group Synchronization During Collaborative Drawing Using Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy

Published on: August 5, 2022

2.1K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 2, 2026

Inter-Brain Synchrony in Open-Ended Collaborative Learning: An fNIRS-Hyperscanning Study
04:44

Inter-Brain Synchrony in Open-Ended Collaborative Learning: An fNIRS-Hyperscanning Study

Published on: July 21, 2021

4.2K
The Collective Trust Game: An Online Group Adaptation of the Trust Game Based on the HoneyComb Paradigm
06:18

The Collective Trust Game: An Online Group Adaptation of the Trust Game Based on the HoneyComb Paradigm

Published on: October 20, 2022

2.3K
Group Synchronization During Collaborative Drawing Using Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy
07:53

Group Synchronization During Collaborative Drawing Using Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy

Published on: August 5, 2022

2.1K

Area of Science:

  • Scientific collaboration
  • Translational research
  • Interdisciplinary studies

Background:

  • Interdisciplinary efforts are increasingly vital for scientific discovery and translational research.
  • Highly integrated research teams exhibit specific characteristics contributing to their success.
  • Understanding these characteristics is key to developing and sustaining collaborative scientific endeavors.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To identify critical elements for the success and effectiveness of scientific research teams.
  • To analyze factors contributing to team success versus those leading to conflict or failure.
  • To provide insights for leaders and members of scientific teams.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of in-depth interviews with members of successful research teams.
  • Comparative analysis with teams that failed or encountered conflicts.
  • Qualitative research methodology.

Main Results:

  • Trust is a foundational element; its absence risks team dynamic deterioration.
  • Critical success factors include developing a shared vision and strategic team member identification.
  • Promoting constructive disagreement while managing conflict and setting clear expectations for credit/authorship are essential.

Conclusions:

  • Effective scientific team leadership requires self-awareness and strong communication skills.
  • While successful teams share effective practices, execution varies among leaders.
  • Supporting features, particularly trust and clear expectations, are critical for maintaining focus on the central scientific goal.