Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 22, 2026

Benefits of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in an Asynchronous Heart Failure Model Induced by Left Bundle Branch Ablation and Rapid Pacing
Published on: December 11, 2017
Implantable cardioverter defibrillator therapy activation for high risk patients with relatively well preserved left
Konstantinos A Gatzoulis1, Dimitris Tsiachris, Polichronis Dilaveris
1First Cardiology Department, University of Athens Medical School, Hippokration Hospital, Athens, Greece. kgatzoul@med.uoa.gr
Insights
Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) therapy may benefit heart failure patients with reduced ejection fraction. However, patients with LVEF ≤ 35% experienced higher mortality, suggesting careful risk stratification is needed.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Electrophysiology
- Preventive Medicine
Background:
- Current guidelines recommend implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) for primary prevention of sudden cardiac death in patients with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤ 35%.
- This study investigates mortality and ICD activation rates in patients stratified by LVEF cut-off values.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare mortality and ICD activation rates in patients receiving ICDs, specifically examining the impact of LVEF ≤ 35% versus preserved LVEF.
- To evaluate the effectiveness of ICDs in primary prevention of sudden cardiac death across different LVEF groups.
Main Methods:
- A cohort of 495 ICD recipients was followed for a mean of 41.1 months.
- Patients were categorized based on LVEF ≤ 35% and LVEF >35%, with primary prevention defined by guideline criteria or inducible ventricular arrhythmia.
- Mortality and appropriate device therapy rates were compared between groups.
Main Results:
- Patients with LVEF ≤ 35% had significantly higher total mortality (18% vs. 11%) and cardiac death (15.4% vs. 5.5%) compared to those with preserved LVEF.
- No significant difference in appropriate ICD therapy incidence was observed between LVEF groups (56.9% vs. 65.8%).
- Advanced New York Heart Association stage was a predictor of both total and cardiac mortality.
Conclusions:
- ICD therapy may offer protection against arrhythmic events in heart failure patients, particularly when guided by electrophysiology-based risk stratification.
- The findings suggest that while ICDs provide appropriate therapy, LVEF ≤ 35% is associated with increased overall mortality, necessitating tailored risk assessment.
Background:
Current guidelines for the primary prevention of sudden cardiac death have used a left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤ 35% as a critical point to justify implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) implantation in post myocardial infarction patients and in those with nonischemic dilated cardiomyopathy. We compared mortality and ICD activation rates among different ICD group recipients using a cut-off value for LVEF ≤ 35%.
Methods:
We followed up for a mean period of 41.1 months 495 ICD recipients (442 males, 65.6 years old, 68.9% post myocardial infarction patients, 422 with LVEF ≤ 35%). Prevention was considered primary in patients who fulfilled guidelines criteria or had inducible ventricular arrhythmia during programmed ventricular stimulation for patients with LVEF >35%.
Results:
Over the course of the trial, 84 of 495 patients died; 69 experienced cardiac death (6 sudden) and 15 non cardiac death. ICD recipients with LVEF ≤ 35% compared to those with preserved LVEF (mean LVEF=43%) had a greater incidence of total mortality (18% vs. 11%, log rank p=0.028) and cardiac death (15.4% vs. 5.5%, log rank p=0.005). There was no difference in the incidence for appropriate device therapy between patients with LVEF ≤ 35% and those with LVEF >35% (56.9% vs. 65.8%, log rank p=0.93). In the multivariate analysis the presence of advanced New York Heart Association stage predicted both total mortality (HR=2.69, 95% CI 1.771-4.086) and cardiac death (HR=3.437, 95% CI 2.163-5.463).
Conclusions:
ICD therapy may protect heart failure patients at early stages from arrhythmic morbidity and mortality, based on an electrophysiology-guided risk stratification approach.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Cardiomyopathy V: Interprofessional Care
Cardiomyopathy II: Dilated Cardiomyopathy
Heart Failure VI: Adjunct Therapies
Cardiomyopathy III: Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy
Heart Failure V: Medical Management
Heart Failure Drugs: Inhibitors of Renin-Angiotensin System

