Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Compartment Models: Single-Compartment Model

Compartment Models: Single-Compartment Model

The single-compartment model serves as a simplified representation of the human body. This model assumes that the body functions as a single, well-mixed open compartment. When a drug is administered intravenously, it enters the body and quickly distributes uniformly. The drug then undergoes biotransformation and elimination, ultimately leaving the body. The volume of this compartment is referred to as the apparent volume of distribution into which the drug can uniformly distribute. In this...

Model Approaches for Pharmacokinetic Data: Compartment Models

Model Approaches for Pharmacokinetic Data: Compartment Models

Compartmental analysis is a widely adopted approach to characterizing drug pharmacokinetics. It uses compartment models that conceptualize the body as a collection of reversibly communicating compartments, each representing a group of tissues exhibiting similar drug distribution characteristics. The movement rate of the drug between these compartments is typically described by first-order kinetics.
Two primary types of compartment models are recognized: mammillary and catenary. The more...

Compartment Models: Two-Compartment Model

Compartment Models: Two-Compartment Model

The two-compartment model divides the body into central and peripheral compartments to account for varying blood perfusion rates among organs and tissues, affecting drug distribution. The central compartment includes blood and highly perfused tissues with rapid drug distribution, while the peripheral compartment contains tissues with slower drug distribution. After a single IV bolus dose, the drug concentration is high in plasma and low in tissues. The drug distribution between compartments...

Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Individual and Population Analysis

Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Individual and Population Analysis

Mechanistic models are utilized in individual analysis using single-source data, but imperfections arise due to data collection errors, preventing perfect prediction of observed data. The mathematical equation involves known values (Xi), observed concentrations (Ci), measurement errors (εi), model parameters (ϕj), and the related function (ƒi) for i number of values. Different least-squares metrics quantify differences between predicted and observed values. The ordinary least squares (OLS)...

One-Compartment Open Model: Wagner-Nelson and Loo Riegelman Method for ka Estimation

One-Compartment Open Model: Wagner-Nelson and Loo Riegelman Method for k_a Estimation

This lesson introduces two critical methods in pharmacokinetics, the Wagner-Nelson and Loo-Riegelman methods, used for estimating the absorption rate constant (ka) for drugs administered via non-intravenous routes. The Wagner-Nelson method relates ka to the plasma concentration derived from the slope of a semilog percent unabsorbed time plot. However, it is limited to drugs with one-compartment kinetics and can be impacted by factors like gastrointestinal motility or enzymatic degradation.
On...

Multicompartment Models: Overview

Multicompartment Models: Overview

Multicompartment models are mathematical constructs that depict how drugs are distributed and eliminated within the body. They segment the body into several compartments, symbolizing various physiological or anatomical areas connected through drug transfer processes such as absorption, metabolism, distribution, and elimination.
These models offer a more comprehensive representation of drug behavior in the body than one-compartment models. They accommodate the complexity of drug distribution,...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

A compressed sensing based approach on Discrete Algebraic Reconstruction Technique.

Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Annual International Conference·2016

Same author

A mobile application for cognitive screening of dementia.

Computer methods and programs in biomedicine·2014

Same author

Quality and precision of parametric images created from PET sinogram data by direct reconstruction: proof of concept.

IEEE transactions on medical imaging·2014

Same author

Clustering dynamic PET images on the Gaussian distributed sinogram domain.

Computer methods and programs in biomedicine·2009

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 22, 2026

Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach

Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach

Published on: July 3, 2020

Computation of variance in compartment model parameter estimates from dynamic PET data.

Mustafa E Kamasak¹

¹Faculty of Computer and Informatics, Istanbul Technical University, Maslak, Istanbul, Turkey. kamasak@itu.edu.tr

Medical Physics

|May 8, 2012

Summary

The analytical variance framework accurately estimates kinetic parameters in one-tissue (1T) and two-tissue (2T) compartment models, even with high noise levels, showing good agreement with Monte Carlo simulations.

More Related Videos

Identification of Disease-related Spatial Covariance Patterns using Neuroimaging Data

Identification of Disease-related Spatial Covariance Patterns using Neuroimaging Data

Published on: June 26, 2013

Software for Analysis of Heart Rate and Blood Pressure Time-series Data from the Valsalva Maneuver

Software for Analysis of Heart Rate and Blood Pressure Time-series Data from the Valsalva Maneuver

Published on: June 27, 2025

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 22, 2026

Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach

Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach

Published on: July 3, 2020

Identification of Disease-related Spatial Covariance Patterns using Neuroimaging Data

Identification of Disease-related Spatial Covariance Patterns using Neuroimaging Data

Published on: June 26, 2013

Software for Analysis of Heart Rate and Blood Pressure Time-series Data from the Valsalva Maneuver

Software for Analysis of Heart Rate and Blood Pressure Time-series Data from the Valsalva Maneuver

Published on: June 27, 2025

Area of Science:

Pharmacokinetics and Physiological Modeling
Biophysical Modeling and Simulation
Quantitative Imaging Analysis

Background:

Accurate estimation of kinetic parameters is crucial for understanding biological processes using compartment models.
Quantifying the uncertainty (variance) in these estimations is essential for reliable interpretation.
Existing methods for variance estimation require comparison with simulation-based approaches.

Purpose of the Study:

To validate an analytical framework for calculating variance in kinetic parameter estimations.
To compare analytical variance with Monte Carlo simulation variance across different noise levels and model complexities.
To assess the applicability of the analytical variance framework for one-tissue (1T) and two-tissue (2T) compartment models.

Main Methods:

Generated time-activity curves (TACs) for 1T and 2T models.
Added Gaussian noise to TACs to simulate various noise levels.
Estimated kinetic parameters by minimizing weighted squared error.
Computed standard deviation analytically and via Monte Carlo simulations.
Compared analytical and simulation-based variance ratios.

Main Results:

The difference between analytical and Monte Carlo variance increased with noise and model complexity.
Analytical variance showed less than 3% difference for 1T and 10% for 2T models.
Standard deviation of analytical variance remained below 15% for both models across all noise levels.

Conclusions:

The analytical variance framework provides a valid and reliable method for estimating uncertainty in kinetic parameters.
The framework is applicable to both 1T and 2T compartment models, even under high noise conditions.
This analytical approach offers an efficient alternative to computationally intensive Monte Carlo simulations.