Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Buoyancy and Stability for Submerged and Floating Bodies01:11

Buoyancy and Stability for Submerged and Floating Bodies

In fluid mechanics, buoyancy and stability are key concepts for understanding the behavior of submerged and floating bodies. When a stationary body is fully or partially submerged in a fluid, the fluid exerts a force on the body known as the buoyant force. This force acts vertically upward through a point called the center of buoyancy, which is the center of the displaced fluid volume. According to Archimedes' principle, the magnitude of the buoyant force is equal to the weight of the fluid...
Drug Dissolution: Requirements and Profile Comparison01:14

Drug Dissolution: Requirements and Profile Comparison

The acceptance criteria for dissolution profile data are anchored in Q values, representing the percentage of drug dissolved within a specified period. This assessment unfolds in three stages:First Stage: The test passes if all six drug dosage units are equal to or greater than Q plus 5%; otherwise, the sample proceeds to the second stage.Second Stage: The average of twelve units must be equal to or greater than Q, with no unit falling below Q - 15% to pass; if not, it progresses to the final...
Buoyancy01:12

Buoyancy

When an object is placed in a fluid, it either floats or sinks. All objects in a fluid experience a buoyant force. For example, a metal ball sinks, while a rubber ball floats. Similarly, a submarine can sink and float by adjusting its buoyancy.  The concept of buoyancy raises several interesting questions. For instance, where does this buoyant force come from? How much buoyant force is required to make an object sink or float? Do objects that sink get any support at all from the fluid? 
To get...
In Vitro Drug Dissolution: Compendial Testing Models II01:09

In Vitro Drug Dissolution: Compendial Testing Models II

Various dissolution methods are utilized to assess a drug’s dissolution rate, including the flow-through cell, paddle-over-disk, cylinder, and reciprocating disk methods.The flow-through cell apparatus (USP (United States Pharmacopeia) method 4) comprises a reservoir for the dissolution medium and a pump that propels the medium through the cell containing the test sample. This method is crucial for assessing modified-release dosage forms with minimally soluble active ingredients, maintaining...
In Vitro Drug Dissolution: Compendial Testing Models I01:13

In Vitro Drug Dissolution: Compendial Testing Models I

Compendial dissolution methods are standardized procedures defined by pharmacopeias to evaluate the rate at which a drug dissolves in a specific medium. These methods ensure batch-to-batch consistency, enable quality control, and support the prediction of drug bioavailability. They are critical for both immediate and modified-release drug products.The apparatuses used for dissolution testing differ in their design and mechanical function, but all aim to simulate the physiological environment of...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

CSCAN: Conformational Analysis of Macrocyclic Peptides through NMR Chemical Shifts.

Journal of chemical information and modeling·2026
Same author

Structure-based pose prediction: Non-cognate docking extended to macrocyclic ligands.

Journal of computer-aided molecular design·2024
Same author

From UK-2A to florylpicoxamid: Active learning to identify a mimic of a macrocyclic natural product.

Journal of computer-aided molecular design·2024
Same author

Correction: Complex peptide macrocycle optimization: combining NMR restraints with conformational analysis to guide structure-based and ligand-based design.

Journal of computer-aided molecular design·2024
Same author

Complex peptide macrocycle optimization: combining NMR restraints with conformational analysis to guide structure-based and ligand-based design.

Journal of computer-aided molecular design·2023
Same author

Unmasking the True Identity of Rapamycin's Minor Conformer.

Journal of natural products·2023
Same journal

Topological data analysis for antibody-drug conjugate payload discovery: a computational framework for mechanistic classification and target validation.

Journal of computer-aided molecular design·2026
Same journal

Commentary on the fundamentals and development of artificial intelligence models in the life sciences and best research practices.

Journal of computer-aided molecular design·2026
Same journal

RANQSAR: a standalone open-source application for reproducible machine learning-based QSAR analysis.

Journal of computer-aided molecular design·2026
Same journal

Integrating evolutionary and compositional features with ML and DL for robust and interpretable druggable protein prediction.

Journal of computer-aided molecular design·2026
Same journal

QUAD: a composite risk framework integrating uncertainty, applicability domain, and model disagreement for reliable QSAR predictions.

Journal of computer-aided molecular design·2026
Same journal

Comparative quantum-chemical investigation of 2-chloro-N-(4-methoxyphenyl)acetamide and 2-(4-methoxyphenylamino)-2-oxoethyl meth/acrylate: DFT, TD-DFT, and non-covalent interaction analyses.

Journal of computer-aided molecular design·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 22, 2026

Incorporating Target Protein Structure Flexibility and Dynamics in Computational Drug Discovery Using Ensemble-Based Docking Analysis
08:49

Incorporating Target Protein Structure Flexibility and Dynamics in Computational Drug Discovery Using Ensemble-Based Docking Analysis

Published on: June 20, 2025

Surflex-Dock: Docking benchmarks and real-world application.

Russell Spitzer1, Ajay N Jain

  • 1Deparment of Bioengineering and Therapeutic Sciences, Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.

Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design
|May 10, 2012
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Molecular docking benchmarks show that cross-docking protocols improve pose prediction accuracy. Combining multiple screening methods and using diverse protein conformations enhances virtual screening performance.

More Related Videos

SNARE-mediated Fusion of Single Proteoliposomes with Tethered Supported Bilayers in a Microfluidic Flow Cell Monitored by Polarized TIRF Microscopy
10:58

SNARE-mediated Fusion of Single Proteoliposomes with Tethered Supported Bilayers in a Microfluidic Flow Cell Monitored by Polarized TIRF Microscopy

Published on: August 24, 2016

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 22, 2026

Incorporating Target Protein Structure Flexibility and Dynamics in Computational Drug Discovery Using Ensemble-Based Docking Analysis
08:49

Incorporating Target Protein Structure Flexibility and Dynamics in Computational Drug Discovery Using Ensemble-Based Docking Analysis

Published on: June 20, 2025

SNARE-mediated Fusion of Single Proteoliposomes with Tethered Supported Bilayers in a Microfluidic Flow Cell Monitored by Polarized TIRF Microscopy
10:58

SNARE-mediated Fusion of Single Proteoliposomes with Tethered Supported Bilayers in a Microfluidic Flow Cell Monitored by Polarized TIRF Microscopy

Published on: August 24, 2016

Area of Science:

  • Computational chemistry
  • Drug discovery
  • Structural biology

Background:

  • Traditional molecular docking benchmarks focus on pose prediction accuracy using cognate ligands.
  • Virtual screening performance is typically measured using large, diverse datasets of protein targets and ligands.
  • Existing benchmarks may not fully capture the complexities of real-world drug discovery scenarios.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate molecular docking performance on established benchmarks for both pose prediction and virtual screening.
  • To investigate the impact of different docking protocols and data preparation methods on performance.
  • To identify strategies for improving the accuracy and efficiency of molecular docking in drug discovery.

Main Methods:

  • Pose prediction was assessed using the Astex Diverse set (85 protein-ligand complexes).
  • Virtual screening performance was evaluated on the DUD set (40 protein targets).
  • Cross-docking protocols, multiple screening methods (docking, 2D/3D similarity), and multiple protein conformations were tested.

Main Results:

  • Re-prepared benchmark datasets yielded results consistent with previous Surflex-Dock reports.
  • Minor protein coordinate changes significantly impacted pose prediction accuracy, highlighting limitations of cognate ligand re-docking.
  • Cross-docking protocols substantially improved pose prediction performance.
  • Combining multiple screening methods and using multiple protein conformations significantly enhanced virtual screening enrichment.

Conclusions:

  • Cognate ligand re-docking is limited for assessing pose prediction accuracy due to sensitivity to minor structural variations.
  • Cross-docking protocols offer improved pose prediction by accounting for protein flexibility.
  • Ensemble-based virtual screening approaches, combining diverse methods and protein conformations, are crucial for robust drug discovery pipelines.