Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Decision Making

Decision Making

Decision-making is a fundamental cognitive process that involves evaluating alternatives and selecting among them. This process can range from simple choices, such as deciding what to wear, to complex decisions, like choosing a major in college or a career path. The complexity of the decision often dictates the approach we use, which can be broadly categorized into two types: automatic and controlled decision-making.
Automatic decision-making is fast, intuitive, and relies on gut feelings...

Cognitive Learning

Cognitive Learning

Cognitive learning is based on purposive behavior, incidental learning, and insight learning.
E. C. Tolman's theory of purposive behavior emphasizes that much behavior is goal-directed. He argued that to understand behavior, we must look at the entire sequence of actions leading to a goal. For instance, high school students study hard, not just due to past reinforcement but also to achieve the goal of getting into a good college.
Tolman introduced the idea that behavior is influenced by...

Decision Making: Traditional Method

Decision Making: Traditional Method

The process of hypothesis testing based on the traditional method includes calculating the critical value, testing the value of the test statistic using the sample data, and interpreting these values.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...

Purposive Learning

Purposive Learning

E. C. Tolman emphasized the purposiveness of behavior — the idea that much of our behavior is goal-directed. For instance, employees who aim for a promotion work diligently to meet their targets. Tolman argued that when classical conditioning and operant conditioning occur, the organism acquires certain expectations. In classical conditioning, a child might fear a dog because they expect it to bite. In operant conditioning, a person might consistently work overtime because they expect a bonus...

Reason and Intuition

Reason and Intuition

The human brain processes information for decision-making using one of two routes: an intuitive system and a rational system (Epstein, 1994; popularized by Kahneman, 2011 as System 1 and System 2, respectively). The intuitive system is quick, impulsive, and operates with minimal effort, relying on emotions or habits to provide cues for what to do next, while the rational system is logical, analytical, deliberate, and methodical. Research in neuropsychology suggests that the brain can only use...

Heuristics

Heuristics

Heuristics are problem-solving strategies that use mental shortcuts to simplify decision-making. Unlike algorithms, which must be followed precisely to achieve a correct result, heuristics offer a general problem-solving framework. They save time and energy but can sometimes lead to less rational decisions.
People often rely on heuristics when faced with an overload of information, limited time, low importance of the decision, limited information, or when a heuristic readily comes to mind. For...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Social networks affect redistribution decisions and polarization.

PNAS nexus·2025

Same author

How sampling strategies shape experience-based risky choice.

Cognitive psychology·2025

Same author

Development and retrospective validation of an artificial intelligence system for diagnostic assessment of prostate biopsies: study protocol.

BMJ open·2025

Same author

Attentional processes underlying health state valuation with time trade-off and standard gamble tasks.

Journal of health economics·2025

Same author

The affect gap in risky choice is similar for younger and older adults.

Psychology and aging·2025

Same author

Physical Color Calibration of Digital Pathology Scanners for Robust Artificial Intelligence-Assisted Cancer Diagnosis.

Modern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc·2025

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 22, 2026

New Variations for Strategy Set-shifting in the Rat

New Variations for Strategy Set-shifting in the Rat

Published on: January 23, 2017

Type of learning task impacts performance and strategy selection in decision making.

Thorsten Pachur¹, Henrik Olsson

¹Department of Psychology, University of Basel, Missionsstrasse 60/62, 4055 Basel, Switzerland. thorsten.pachur@unibas.ch

Cognitive Psychology

|May 12, 2012

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Learning how to make decisions by comparing options, rather than direct learning, improves cognitive generalization. This highlights how learning methods critically influence decision-making strategies.

More Related Videos

Operant Protocols for Assessing the Cost-benefit Analysis During Reinforced Decision Making by Rodents

Operant Protocols for Assessing the Cost-benefit Analysis During Reinforced Decision Making by Rodents

Published on: September 10, 2018

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 22, 2026

New Variations for Strategy Set-shifting in the Rat

New Variations for Strategy Set-shifting in the Rat

Published on: January 23, 2017

Operant Protocols for Assessing the Cost-benefit Analysis During Reinforced Decision Making by Rodents

Operant Protocols for Assessing the Cost-benefit Analysis During Reinforced Decision Making by Rodents

Published on: September 10, 2018

Area of Science:

Cognitive Science
Decision Making
Machine Learning

Background:

Adaptive cognition relies on understanding environmental statistical structures.
Decision-making strategies can be cue-based or exemplar-based.
Knowledge acquisition methods critically influence cognitive performance.

Purpose of the Study:

To investigate how different learning tasks (learning by comparison vs. direct criterion learning) impact decision performance and strategy selection.
To determine the generalizability of learning outcomes across different task formats and environments.
To explore the underlying computational mechanisms driving strategy selection.

Main Methods:

Three experiments were conducted involving participants trained via learning by comparison or direct criterion learning.
Participants were subsequently tested on paired-comparison, classification, and estimation tasks.
Computational modeling was used to analyze strategy selection differences.

Main Results:

Learning by comparison led to superior generalization performance, even with less information and differing task formats.
Learning by comparison facilitated accurate continuous estimations.
Direct criterion learning favored exemplar-based processing, while learning by comparison favored cue-based mechanisms.
In a nonlinear environment, direct criterion learning resulted in better decision performance.

Conclusions:

The method of knowledge acquisition significantly impacts the selection of decision-making strategies.
Comparison processes play a key role in cognitive generalization and adaptive decision-making.
The effectiveness of learning strategies is context-dependent, varying with environmental structure.