Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Nonconscious Mimicry01:13

Nonconscious Mimicry

Nonconscious mimicry occurs when individuals alter their mannerisms to match the behaviors and expressions of those nearby, without intention.
Automatic Processing and Automatic Social Behavior01:28

Automatic Processing and Automatic Social Behavior

Automatic processing refers to the cognitive operations that occur without conscious intent or awareness, playing a fundamental role in shaping social cognition and behavior. These processes enable individuals to navigate complex social environments efficiently by relying on mental shortcuts and pre-existing knowledge structures known as schemas. One of the most influential mechanisms underlying automatic processing is priming, which subtly activates mental representations through exposure to...
Parallel Processing01:20

Parallel Processing

The brain processes sensory information rapidly due to parallel processing, which involves sending data across multiple neural pathways at the same time. This method allows the brain to manage various sensory qualities, such as shapes, colors, movements, and locations, all concurrently. For instance, when observing a forest landscape, the brain simultaneously processes the movement of leaves, the shapes of trees, the depth between them, and the various shades of green. This enables a quick and...
Causes of Similarity-Dissimilarity Effect01:26

Causes of Similarity-Dissimilarity Effect

The similarity-dissimilarity effect, a fundamental concept in social psychology, explains how interpersonal similarities and differences influence attraction and social interactions. This effect is supported by three key psychological perspectives: balance theory, social comparison theory, and consensual validation.Balance Theory and Cognitive ConsistencyBalance theory, developed by Fritz Heider, posits that individuals seek cognitive consistency in their relationships. When two people share...
Stereotype Content Model02:16

Stereotype Content Model

The Stereotype Content Model (SCM) was first proposed by Susan Fiske and her colleagues (Fiske, Cuddy, Glick & Xu, 2002; see also Fiske, 2012 and Fiske, 2017). The SCM specifies that when someone encounters a new group, they will stereotype them based on two metrics: warmth—or that group’s perceived intent, and how likely they are to provide help or inflict harm—and competence—or their ability to carry out that objective. Depending on the warmth-competence categorization, a person will feel...
Observational Learning01:12

Observational Learning

Albert Bandura's observational learning, also known as imitation or modeling, occurs when a person observes and imitates another's behavior. It is a quicker process than operant conditioning. A well-known example is the Bobo doll study, where children who saw an adult acting aggressively towards the doll were more likely to act aggressively when left alone, compared to those who observed a nonaggressive adult. Many psychologists view observational learning as a form of latent learning because...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Individuals with aphantasia show independent impairments in face perception and face memory, but not face matching.

Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior·2026
Same author

Mentalising impairments in somatic symptom and functional neurological disorders: A systematic review.

Journal of psychosomatic research·2026
Same author

Associations Between Autism and Self-Reported Dimensions of Interoception.

Autism : the international journal of research and practice·2026
Same author

Failure to account for psychiatric symptoms: Implications for the replicability and generalizability of psychological science?

Psychological medicine·2025
Same author

Feedback on Mental State Inferences Improves Accuracy and Awareness.

Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)·2025
Same author

Pseudo-specificity, pseudo-modules, and pseudo-models in paranoia.

Trends in cognitive sciences·2025
Same journal

Pronoun Resolution in Turkish: The Interplay of Referential Form, Word Order, and Implicit Causality.

Cognitive science·2026
Same journal

What's in a Color?: Language, Synesthesia, and Categorical Perception.

Cognitive science·2026
Same journal

Reasoning Beyond Explicit Rules: Adults' and Children's Use of Closure Principles in Novel Cases.

Cognitive science·2026
Same journal

Intermediary Object States Are Activated by Sentences Describing Completed Events.

Cognitive science·2026
Same journal

Large Language Models Estimate Fine-Grained Human Color-Concept Associations.

Cognitive science·2026
Same journal

Computational Models of Causal Reasoning: Bayesian Accounts of Normative Violations.

Cognitive science·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 22, 2026

Creating Virtual-hand and Virtual-face Illusions to Investigate Self-representation
06:53

Creating Virtual-hand and Virtual-face Illusions to Investigate Self-representation

Published on: March 1, 2017

Are automatic imitation and spatial compatibility mediated by different processes?

Richard P Cooper1, Caroline Catmur, Cecilia Heyes

  • 1Department of Psychological Sciences, Birkbeck, University of London, London WC1E 7HX, UK. r.cooper@bbk.ac.uk

Cognitive Science
|May 15, 2012
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study introduces a model suggesting automatic imitation and spatial compatibility share underlying cognitive processes. The interactive activation model supports a unified mechanism for these stimulus-response compatibility effects.

More Related Videos

Methods for Presenting Real-world Objects Under Controlled Laboratory Conditions
06:54

Methods for Presenting Real-world Objects Under Controlled Laboratory Conditions

Published on: June 21, 2019

Perceptual and Category Processing of the Uncanny Valley Hypothesis' Dimension of Human Likeness: Some Methodological Issues
07:34

Perceptual and Category Processing of the Uncanny Valley Hypothesis' Dimension of Human Likeness: Some Methodological Issues

Published on: June 3, 2013

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 22, 2026

Creating Virtual-hand and Virtual-face Illusions to Investigate Self-representation
06:53

Creating Virtual-hand and Virtual-face Illusions to Investigate Self-representation

Published on: March 1, 2017

Methods for Presenting Real-world Objects Under Controlled Laboratory Conditions
06:54

Methods for Presenting Real-world Objects Under Controlled Laboratory Conditions

Published on: June 21, 2019

Perceptual and Category Processing of the Uncanny Valley Hypothesis' Dimension of Human Likeness: Some Methodological Issues
07:34

Perceptual and Category Processing of the Uncanny Valley Hypothesis' Dimension of Human Likeness: Some Methodological Issues

Published on: June 3, 2013

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Social Psychology

Background:

  • Automatic imitation, or imitative compatibility, is linked to the mirror neuron system and models spontaneous motor mimicry.
  • Imitative and spatial compatibility effects rely on distinct stimulus dimensions: topography versus spatial position.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate whether imitative and spatial compatibility effects are mediated by shared or distinct cognitive processes.
  • To present a computational model that simulates existing experimental findings on these compatibility effects.

Main Methods:

  • Development of an interactive activation model with a dual-route architecture.
  • Simulation of key results from Catmur and Heyes (2011) experimental study.

Main Results:

  • The model successfully captured the differential sizes of imitative and spatial compatibility effects.
  • The model accounted for the lack of interaction when stimuli were simultaneous and differences in response times.
  • The model explained the distinct time courses of compatibility effects under asynchronous stimulus presentation.

Conclusions:

  • The findings support the view that imitative and spatial compatibility effects are mediated by similar cognitive processes.
  • The interactive activation model provides a unified framework for understanding different types of stimulus-response compatibility.