Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 22, 2026
13:35
Endoscopic Bilateral Nipple-sparing Mastectomy via a Single Axillary Incision with Immediate Pre-pectoral Implant-based Breast Reconstruction
Published on: May 17, 2024
How should we investigate breast implant rupture?
Phoebe M Hold1, Shabana Alam, William J Pilbrow
1Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, The Countess of Chester Hospital, Cheshire, United Kingdom.
The Breast Journal
|May 16, 2012
Summary
Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) is the best method for detecting breast implant rupture, showing 83% sensitivity and 90% specificity. Ultrasound Scanning (US) is a good alternative, with high concordance with MRI results.
Area of Science:
- Plastic Surgery
- Radiology
- Diagnostic Imaging
Background:
- Breast implants are common for augmentation and reconstruction.
- Implant rupture is a potential complication requiring accurate diagnosis.
- Clinical examination, Ultrasound Scanning (US), and Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) are used to detect rupture.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of clinical examination, US, and MRI for diagnosing breast implant rupture.
- To assess the correlation between US and MRI in detecting implant rupture.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective review of 34 patients with 60 breast implants over 26 months.
- Patients underwent both US and MRI to diagnose implant rupture.
- Comparison of diagnostic results with surgical findings.
Main Results:
- MRI demonstrated the highest sensitivity (83%) and specificity (90%) for rupture detection.
- US showed 50% sensitivity and 90% specificity.
- Concordance between US and MRI was high at 87%.
Conclusions:
- MRI is the preferred imaging modality for diagnosing breast implant rupture.
- US is a valuable alternative, especially when positive, potentially negating the need for MRI.
- Understanding the diagnostic performance of US and MRI optimizes resource utilization.
