Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 22, 2026

A Cognitive Fusion-guided Prostate Biopsy Using Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Transrectal Ultrasound
Published on: March 21, 2025
Positive predictive value of BI-RADS MR imaging
Mary C Mahoney1, Constantine Gatsonis, Lucy Hanna
1Department of Radiology, University of Cincinnati Medical Center, 234 Goodman St, ML 772, Cincinnati, OH 45267, USA. mary.mahoney@uchealth.com
This study evaluated Breast Imaging and Reporting Data Systems (BI-RADS) categories for breast MRI, finding that specific lesion features significantly improve cancer prediction. BI-RADS categories and morphology help estimate malignancy likelihood in breast MR imaging.
Area of Science:
- Radiology
- Oncology
- Medical Imaging
Background:
- Breast magnetic resonance (MR) imaging is crucial for detecting breast cancer.
- The Breast Imaging and Reporting Data Systems (BI-RADS) provides a standardized lexicon for reporting.
- Accurate assessment of BI-RADS categories and lesion features is vital for predicting malignancy.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the positive predictive values (PPVs) of BI-RADS assessment categories in breast MR imaging.
- To identify specific BI-RADS MR imaging lesion features that are most predictive of breast cancer.
Main Methods:
- Prospective, multicenter study evaluating contralateral breast MR imaging in women with recent breast cancer diagnoses.
- Assessed BI-RADS categories, morphologic descriptors (foci, masses, non-masslike enhancement - NMLE), and kinetic features for malignancy prediction.
- Estimated PPVs and used logistic regression to analyze the predictive ability of lesion combinations.
Main Results:
- Of 969 participants, most had BI-RADS 1/2 (71.3%), with fewer in categories 3 (10.9%) and 4/5 (10.0%).
- Thirty-one cancers were detected; overall PPV for BI-RADS 4/5 was 0.278 (category 4 PPV 0.205, category 5 PPV 0.714).
- For masses, irregular shape/margins and spiculated margins were highly predictive. For NMLEs, ductal, clumped, and reticular/dendritic enhancement were common in malignancies. Kinetic features were less predictive than morphology.
Conclusions:
- Standardized BI-RADS terminology allows quantification of malignancy likelihood in breast MR imaging.
- BI-RADS assessment categories and morphologic descriptors for masses and NMLE are valuable for estimating cancer probability.
- Careful evaluation of lesion features enhances the diagnostic accuracy of breast MR imaging.
Related Concept Videos
Radiological Investigation II: MRI and Ventilation Perfusion Scan
Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) and Ventilation Perfusion Scans are two radiological investigations that offer detailed diagnostic images of the body, particularly lung structures.
MRI
MRI uses magnetic fields and radiofrequency signals to distinguish between normal and abnormal tissues. This technology provides a more detailed diagnostic image than CT scans, enabling it to characterize pulmonary nodules, stage bronchogenic carcinoma, and evaluate inflammatory activity in...
Imaging Studies IV: Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Sensitivity, Specificity, and Predicted Value
Sensitivity is the...
