Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 22, 2026

A Pacing-Controlled Procedure for the Assessment of Heart Rate-Dependent Diastolic Functions in Murine Heart Failure Models
Published on: July 21, 2023
Heart rate achieved or beta-blocker dose in patients with chronic heart failure: which is the better target?
Damien Cullington1, Kevin M Goode, Andrew L Clark
1Department of Cardiology, Post graduate Medical Institute (Hull York Medical School), University of Hull, UK.
Insights
For chronic heart failure patients, resting heart rate at follow-up, not beta-blocker dose, predicts mortality. A target heart rate may improve outcomes in heart failure management.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Pharmacology
Background:
- Beta-blockers are known to reduce mortality in chronic heart failure (CHF) with left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVSD).
- The precise mechanism by which beta-blockers improve outcomes in these patients remains uncertain.
Purpose of the Study:
- To determine if beta-blocker dosage or heart rate is a stronger predictor of mortality in patients with CHF and LVSD.
- To investigate the relationship between heart rate, beta-blocker dose, and survival.
Main Methods:
- A cohort of 654 patients with ejection fraction ≤40% in sinus rhythm were followed for up to 36 months.
- Multivariable models were used to examine the associations between heart rate, beta-blocker dose, and survival at initial and follow-up visits.
- Beta-blocker use increased from 58% to 82% during the study.
Main Results:
- Neither initial heart rate nor beta-blocker dose predicted mortality.
- Resting heart rate at the 4-month follow-up visit was a significant predictor of mortality (P=0.02).
- Patients with a heart rate of 58-64 bpm at follow-up had the best prognosis; beta-blocker use was associated with better outcomes, but dose did not significantly vary prognosis.
Conclusions:
- Both beta-blocker use and resting heart rate at follow-up independently predict prognosis in CHF patients with LVSD.
- Beta-blocker dose was not found to be a significant predictor of mortality.
- Targeting a specific heart rate range may be a beneficial therapeutic goal in managing CHF.
Aims:
To investigate whether the mortality of patients with chronic heart failure (CHF) due to left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVSD) is more strongly related to beta-blocker dose or to heart rate. It is known that beta-blockers reduce mortality in patients with CHF and LVSD, but the primary mechanism of action is uncertain.
Methods And Results:
Patients with an ejection fraction ≤40%, who were in sinus rhythm both at an initial (visit 1) and at a 4-month clinic review (visit 2), were followed for a maximum of 36 months. The relationships between heart rate, beta-blocker dose, and survival in a multivariable model were examined. Of 654 eligible patients, 381 (58%) were started on beta-blockers prior to the initial visit, increasing to 537 (82%) by visit 2. During follow-up, 142 (22%) patients died. Neither resting heart rate nor beta-blocker dose at visit 1 predicted mortality (P = 0.09 and P = 0.99), but resting heart rate at visit 2 did (P = 0.02). Beta-blocker use at visit 2 was associated with better outcome (P = 0.03) but with little variation in outcome according to dose. Patients with a heart rate of 58-64 b.p.m. at visit 2 had the best prognosis.
Conclusions:
The use of beta-blockers and resting heart rate at visit 2 both independently indicated prognosis, but beta-blocker dose did not. Beta-blockers may reduce mortality by several mechanisms; one that may be specific to blockade of adrenergic receptors and another related to heart rate reduction. Achieving a target heart rate range may be an appropriate therapeutic goal for patients with CHF.
Related Concept Videos
Heart Failure Drugs: β-Blockers
Heart Failure V: Medical Management
Heart Failure Drugs: Inhibitors of Renin-Angiotensin System
Antihypertensive Drugs: Types of β-Blockers
Heart Failure IV: Classification and Diagnostic Evaluation
Adrenergic Antagonists: Pharmacological Actions of β-Receptor Blockers
