Comparative proteomic analysis reveals similar and distinct features of proteins in dry and wet stigmas
Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 22, 2026

Metabolic Labeling and Membrane Fractionation for Comparative Proteomic Analysis of Arabidopsis thaliana Suspension Cell Cultures
Published on: September 28, 2013
Ya Lin Sang1, Meng Xu, Fang Fang Ma
1State Key Laboratory of Crop Biology, Shandong Key Laboratory of Crop Biology, College of Life Sciences, Shandong Agricultural University, Taian, Shandong, China.
Abstract:
Angiosperm stigma supports compatible pollen germination and tube growth, resulting in fertilization and seed production. Stigmas are mainly divided into two types, dry and wet, according to the absence or presence of exudates on their surfaces. Here, we used 2DE and MS to identify proteins specifically and preferentially expressed in the stigmas of maize (Zea Mays, dry stigma) and tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum, wet stigma), as well as proteins rinsed from the surface of the tobacco stigma. We found that the specifically and preferentially expressed proteins in maize and tobacco stigmas share similar distributions in functional categories. However, these proteins showed important difference between dry and wet stigmas in a few aspects, such as protein homology in "signal transduction" and "lipid metabolism," relative expression levels of proteins containing signal peptides and proteins in "defense and stress response." These different features might be related to the specific structures and functions of dry and wet stigmas. The possible roles of some stigma-expressed proteins were discussed. Our results provide important information on functions of proteins in dry and wet stigmas and reveal aspects of conservation and divergence between dry and wet stigmas at the proteomic level.
More Related Videos
10:51Consensus Brain-derived Protein, Extraction Protocol for the Study of Human and Murine Brain Proteome Using Both 2D-DIGE and Mini 2DE Immunoblotting
Published on: April 10, 2014
08:04A New Approach for the Comparative Analysis of Multiprotein Complexes Based on 15N Metabolic Labeling and Quantitative Mass Spectrometry
Published on: March 13, 2014