Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Reason and Intuition

Reason and Intuition

The human brain processes information for decision-making using one of two routes: an intuitive system and a rational system (Epstein, 1994; popularized by Kahneman, 2011 as System 1 and System 2, respectively). The intuitive system is quick, impulsive, and operates with minimal effort, relying on emotions or habits to provide cues for what to do next, while the rational system is logical, analytical, deliberate, and methodical. Research in neuropsychology suggests that the brain can only use...

Motivational Bias

Motivational Bias

Cognitive bias results from limitations in thinking and information processing, leading to systematic errors in judgment. Conversely, motivational bias stems from personal desires or emotions, causing distortions in perception to align with self-interest. Motivational bias influences how individuals perceive and attribute causes to events, often shaped by personal needs, goals, and self-esteem preservation. This bias can distort judgment, leading to inaccurate assessments of success, failure,...

Self-Serving Bias

Self-Serving Bias

Self-serving bias is a cognitive phenomenon in which individuals attribute positive outcomes to internal factors such as their abilities, intelligence, or effort while attributing negative outcomes to external circumstances. This cognitive distortion helps maintain self-esteem but can also impede objective self-assessment.Theoretical Explanations of Self-Serving BiasTwo primary theories explain the self-serving bias: the cognitive explanation and the motivational explanation.The cognitive...

Hindsight Biases

Hindsight Biases

Hindsight bias leads you to believe that the event you just experienced was predictable, even though it really wasn’t. In other words, you knew all along that things would turn out the way they did. Can you relate this to the phrase "Hindsight is 20/20" now?

Decision Making: P-value Method

Decision Making: P-value Method

The process of hypothesis testing based on the P-value method includes calculating the P- value using the sample data and interpreting it.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses: a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can have a...

Decision Making

Decision Making

Decision-making is a fundamental cognitive process that involves evaluating alternatives and selecting among them. This process can range from simple choices, such as deciding what to wear, to complex decisions, like choosing a major in college or a career path. The complexity of the decision often dictates the approach we use, which can be broadly categorized into two types: automatic and controlled decision-making.
Automatic decision-making is fast, intuitive, and relies on gut feelings...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Agreements and disagreements with resource-rational contractualism.

The Behavioral and brain sciences·2026

Same author

The Political Psychology of Economic Inequality.

Psychological science in the public interest : a journal of the American Psychological Society·2026

Same author

Random generation is what comes to mind in naturalistic settings.

Cognition·2026

Same author

Imagining and building wise machines: the centrality of AI metacognition.

Trends in cognitive sciences·2026

Same author

Contrasting holistic-compensatory with probabilistic heuristic strategies in multi-attribute decisions.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2026

Same author

Rhythmic sampling of multiple decision alternatives in the human brain.

Nature communications·2026

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 22, 2026

The Adventures of Fundi Intervention Based on the Cognitive and Emotional Processing in Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Patients

The Adventures of Fundi Intervention Based on the Cognitive and Emotional Processing in Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Patients

Published on: June 12, 2020

Salience driven value integration explains decision biases and preference reversal.

Konstantinos Tsetsos¹, Nick Chater, Marius Usher

¹Department of Cognitive, Perceptual, and Brain Sciences, University College London, London WC1H 0AP, United Kingdom. konstantinos.tsetsos@psy.ox.ac.uk

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America

|May 29, 2012

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Human choice behavior involves complex value integration. A new psychophysical task reveals how temporal factors and salience explain choice paradoxes like framing and risk biases.

More Related Videos

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies

Published on: August 25, 2023

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 22, 2026

The Adventures of Fundi Intervention Based on the Cognitive and Emotional Processing in Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Patients

The Adventures of Fundi Intervention Based on the Cognitive and Emotional Processing in Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Patients

Published on: June 12, 2020

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies

Published on: August 25, 2023

Area of Science:

Cognitive Psychology
Decision Science
Neuroeconomics

Background:

Human choice behavior presents numerous paradoxical patterns.
Existing research primarily focuses on value representation, with limited understanding of value integration mechanisms.
Understanding value integration is crucial for explaining complex decision-making.

Purpose of the Study:

To introduce a novel psychophysical task to investigate value integration in multiattribute decisions.
To demonstrate how controlling the temporal distribution of values can illuminate choice anomalies.
To propose a unified mechanism explaining various choice paradoxes.

Main Methods:

Development of a psychophysical task involving choices between streams of rapidly presented numerical values.
Systematic manipulation of the temporal distribution of values within decision streams.
Analysis of participant choices to identify underlying integration mechanisms.

Main Results:

The temporal distribution of values significantly influences choice outcomes, explaining phenomena like temporal and risk biases.
Choice anomalies, including framing biases and preference reversals, are systematically reproduced and explained by the proposed model.
Value integration is shown to be weighted by salience, which is determined by temporal order and rank within the decision context.

Conclusions:

A simple mechanism of value integration, weighted by salience influenced by temporal factors and task framing, can explain numerous human choice anomalies.
The microstructure of value integration provides a powerful framework for understanding complex decision-making and its associated biases.
This research offers new insights into the fundamental processes underlying human judgment and decision-making.