Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 21, 2026
07:09
In situ Compressive Loading and Correlative Noninvasive Imaging of the Bone-periodontal Ligament-tooth Fibrous Joint
Published on: March 7, 2014
Accuracy of probing attachment levels using a new computerized cemento-enamel junction probe
1Department of Periodontology, College of Dental Sciences, Davangere, India.
Journal of Indian Society of Periodontology
|June 2, 2012
Summary
The new cemento-enamel junction (CEJ) probe demonstrates superior accuracy and consistency in measuring clinical attachment level (CAL) for periodontal disease compared to standard probes. This automated probe offers greater reliability for clinicians diagnosing and monitoring periodontal conditions.
Area of Science:
- Periodontology
- Dental Diagnostics
- Biomaterials and Devices
Background:
- Clinical attachment level (CAL) assessment is crucial for periodontal disease management.
- Existing methods like the Florida stent probe (FSP) and University of North Carolina-15 (UNC-15) probe have limitations in accuracy and consistency.
- The cemento-enamel junction (CEJ) offers a stable reference point for CAL measurement.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the performance of a novel cemento-enamel junction (CEJ) probe for CAL assessment.
- To compare the CEJ probe's accuracy and consistency against the Florida stent probe (FSP) and the University of North Carolina-15 (UNC-15) probe.
- To determine the reliability of automated probing using the CEJ probe.
Main Methods:
- Three examiners measured probing attachment level at 384 sites in chronic periodontitis patients and 176 sites in healthy controls.
- Measurements were taken using the CEJ probe, FSP, and UNC-15 probe.
- The study design ensured balanced intra- and inter-examiner consistency over two visits.
Main Results:
- The CEJ probe exhibited significantly higher intra- and inter-examiner consistency than both FSP and UNC-15 in all groups.
- For the CEJ probe, repeated measurements within ≤1 mm occurred in 86.8% to 87.5% of cases.
- The FSP demonstrated greater reproducibility than the UNC-15 probe in detecting relative attachment level (RAL).
Conclusions:
- The automated CEJ probe shows the greatest potential for accurate and consistent CAL detection compared to FSP and UNC-15.
- Automated probing devices appear to be more reproducible than traditional manual probes.
- The CEJ probe offers a promising advancement in periodontal diagnostics.
