Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 21, 2026

Anogenital Distance and Perineal Measurements of the Pelvic Organ Prolapse (POP) Quantification System
Published on: September 20, 2018
Gestational ageism
1Robinson Institute, Discipline of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Adelaide, Australia. dominic.wilkinson@adelaide.edu.au
Insights
Gestational age guidelines for extremely premature infants are questioned for potential discrimination. This analysis compares neonatal resuscitation to elderly patient care, proposing gestational age equivalence as a framework to address ageism in medical decisions.
Area of Science:
- Neonatal medicine
- Medical ethics
- Bioethics
Background:
- Published guidelines for neonatal resuscitation prioritize infant gestational age.
- Concerns exist among ethicists and pediatricians regarding potential discrimination based on gestational age.
- The debate questions whether these guidelines are analogous to ageist policies in elderly care.
Purpose of the Study:
- To examine the relationship between gestational ageism in neonatal care and chronological ageism in elderly care.
- To analyze arguments against current gestational age guidelines for premature infant resuscitation.
- To propose an alternative framework for resuscitation decisions in extremely premature infants.
Main Methods:
- Comparative analysis of ethical arguments concerning age-based medical decisions.
- Review of existing neonatal resuscitation guidelines and ethical critiques.
- Exploration of the concept of gestational age equivalence.
Main Results:
- Resuscitation decisions for premature infants share similarities with those for elderly patients, but also exhibit key differences.
- Two levels of gestational ageism and two distinct lines of argument against current guidelines were identified.
- The study highlights the ethical complexities of age-based medical triage.
Conclusions:
- Current neonatal resuscitation guidelines based on gestational age warrant ethical scrutiny for potential ageism.
- Gestational age equivalence is proposed as a more equitable framework for resuscitation decisions.
- Addressing ageism in medical practice requires careful consideration of both neonatal and geriatric populations.
Abstract:
Published guidelines for resuscitation of extremely premature infants emphasize the importance of the gestational age of the infant. However, some ethicists and pediatricians have questioned these guidelines, suggesting that this may represent a form of discrimination. A policy of nonresuscitation of elderly patients older than a certain age would constitute a form of ageism and would likely be unacceptable to the broader community. Are resuscitation decisions for premature newborn infants analogous to resuscitation of elderly patients? Are current neonatal resuscitation guidelines discriminatory? This article looks at the relationship between discrimination based on gestational age and chronological age. There are 2 levels of gestational ageism and 2 separate strands of argument against gestational age guidelines. I conclude that resuscitation decisions for premature infants share many features with those for elderly patients, although there are also some relevant differences. I propose the use of gestational age equivalence as an alternative framework for practice.
Related Concept Videos
Stereotypes, Prejudice, and Discrimination
Nondisjunction
Meiosis vs. Mitosis
Before the start of mitosis and meiosis I, the cell synthesizes DNA, resulting in two homologous copies of each chromosome. DNA synthesis is...
Teratogenicity
Regression Toward the Mean
Oogenesis
