Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 21, 2026

Holistic Facial Composite Creation and Subsequent Video Line-up Eyewitness Identification Paradigm
Published on: December 24, 2015
The effect of post-identification feedback, delay, and suspicion on accurate eyewitnesses
Deah S Quinlivan1, Jeffrey S Neuschatz, Amy Bradfield Douglass
1Department of Psychology, Iowa State University, West 112 Lagomarcino, Ames, IA 50011, USA. dslawson@iastate.edu
Abstract:
We examined whether post-identification feedback and suspicion affect accurate eyewitnesses. Participants viewed a video event and then made a lineup decision from a target-present photo lineup. Regardless of accuracy, the experimenter either, informed participants that they made a correct lineup decision or gave no information regarding their lineup decision. Immediately following the lineup decision or after a 1-week delay, a second experimenter gave some of the participants who received confirming feedback reason to be suspicious of the confirming feedback. Following immediately after the confirming feedback, accurate witnesses did not demonstrate certainty inflation. However, after a delay accurate witnesses did demonstrate certainty inflation typically associated with confirming feedback. The suspicion manipulation only affected participants' certainty when the confirming feedback created certainty inflation. The results lend support to the accessibility interpretation of the post-identification feedback effect and the erasure interpretation of the suspicion effect.
Related Concept Videos
Eyewitness Memory
One such error is memory distortion, which occurs because human memory does not function like a...
Actor-Observer Effect
False Memories
One primary source of false memories is misattribution, where individuals incorrectly associate external information with...
Hindsight Biases
Bystander Effect
Cause and Effect

