Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 21, 2026
Quasistatic Mechanical Testing for Computer-Aided Design and Manufacturing Occlusal Veneers Cemented to Milled Dentin Analog Material
Published on: December 20, 2024
Conventional and modified veneered zirconia vs. metalloceramic: fatigue and finite element analysis
Nelson R F A Silva1, Estevam Bonfante, Brian T Rafferty
1Department of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, New York University, New York, NY 10010, USA. nrd1@nyu.edu
Purpose:
The purpose of this study was to test the hypothesis that all-ceramic crown core-veneer system reliability is improved by modifying the core design and as a result is comparable in reliability to metal-ceramic retainers (MCR). Finite element analysis (FEA) was performed to verify maximum principal stress distribution in the systems.
Materials And Methods:
A first lower molar full crown preparation was modeled by reducing the height of proximal walls by 1.5 mm and occlusal surface by 2.0 mm. The CAD-based preparation was replicated and positioned in a dental articulator for specimen fabrication. Conventional (0.5 mm uniform thickness) and modified (2.5 mm height, 1 mm thickness at the lingual extending to proximals) zirconia (Y-TZP) core designs were produced with 1.5 mm veneer porcelain. MCR controls were fabricated following conventional design. All crowns were resin cemented to 30-day aged composite dies, aged 14 days in water and either single-loaded to failure or step-stress fatigue tested. The loads were positioned either on the mesiobuccal or mesiolingual cusp (n = 21 for each ceramic system and cusp). Probability Weibull and use level probability curves were calculated. Crack evolution was followed, and postmortem specimens were analyzed and compared to clinical failures.
Results:
Compared to conventional and MCRs, increased levels of stress were observed in the core region for the modified Y-TZP core design. The reliability was higher in the Y-TZP-lingual-modified group at 100,000 cycles and 200 N, but not significantly different from the MCR-mesiolingual group. The MCR-distobuccal group showed the highest reliability. Fracture modes for Y-TZP groups were veneer chipping not exposing the core for the conventional design groups, and exposing the veneer-core interface for the modified group. MCR fractures were mostly chipping combined with metal coping exposure.
Conclusions:
FEA showed higher levels of stress for both Y-TZP core designs and veneer layers compared to MCR. Core design modification resulted in fatigue reliability response of Y-TZP comparable to MCR at 100,000 cycles and 200 N. Fracture modes observed matched with clinical scenarios.
