Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis of the decision regret scale in recipients of internal cardioverter

Ronald L Hickman1, Melissa D Pinto, Eunsuk Lee

  • 1Case Western Reserve University, Frances Payne Bolton School of Nursing, Cleveland, OH 44106-4904, USA. ronald.hickman@case.edu

Insights

The Decision Regret Scale (DRS) reliably measures patient regret after receiving an internal cardioverter defibrillator (ICD). This validated tool aids clinicians and researchers in understanding patient decision-making outcomes.

Area of Science:

  • Cardiology
  • Medical Psychology
  • Health Services Research

Background:

  • Decision regret is a significant factor influencing patient satisfaction and outcomes.
  • The internal cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) is a critical intervention for cardiac patients, involving complex treatment decisions.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To establish the psychometric properties of the Decision Regret Scale (DRS) in patients who received an ICD.
  • To validate the DRS as a reliable and accurate measure of decision regret.

Main Methods:

  • Cross-sectional study with 109 cardiac patients undergoing ICD implantation.
  • Utilized exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses.
  • Assessed internal reliability (Cronbach's alpha = .86) and discriminant validity.

Main Results:

  • The DRS demonstrated strong internal reliability (alpha = .86).
  • Factor analyses supported the construct validity of the DRS.
  • The scale proved to be a reliable and valid measure for assessing decision regret in ICD recipients.

Conclusions:

  • The Decision Regret Scale (DRS) is a psychometrically sound instrument for evaluating decision regret in ICD recipients.
  • The DRS has practical implications for clinicians and researchers aiming to improve patient decision-making and outcomes.
  • Further validation in diverse ICD patient populations is recommended.