Related Experiment Videos
The prevalence of vitamin deficiency in clinical practice is assay-dependent
Saoud Tahsin-Swafiri1, Inmaculada Blanco-Navarro, Belén Pérez-Sacristán
1Servicio de Bioquímica Clínica, Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro-Majadahonda, 28222-Madrid, Spain.
Background & Aim:
Vitamin D deficiency is an important concern in clinical settings and recently, international agencies have recognised the importance of 25-OHD assays in defining vitamin D status. Thus, our aim was to assess the consistency of different vitamin D assays in clinical practice.
Methods:
25-OH-vitamin D was measured in 332 patients by ultra-fast liquid chromatography (UHPLC) and two immunoassays (Liaison Total 25(OH) and ADVIA Centaur Vitamin D Total Assay). Samples from the Vitamin D External Quality Survey (DEQAS) and the Standard Reference Material SRM 972 were used for analytical quality control.
Results:
All methods displayed an acceptable performance with DEQAS samples but immunoassays showed a significant bias against certified materials. Compared to UHPLC, differences were significant for both immunoassays in the deficiency interval but the systematic bias was higher for the ADVIA assay throughout the whole range of concentrations.
Conclusion:
The prevalence of vitamin D deficiency in clinical practice is assay-dependent and physicians should be aware of the uncertainty associated with vitamin D assessment.
Related Concept Videos
Vitamins
Bioavailability: Influencing Factors
Therapeutic Drug Monitoring: Affecting Factors
Effect of Hepatic Disease on Pharmacokinetics: Pathophysiologic Assessment and Liver Function Test
Measurement of Bioavailability: Pharmacodynamic Methods
Drug Concentrations: Measurements
Plasma —...