Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Sensitivity, Specificity, and Predicted Value

Sensitivity, Specificity, and Predicted Value

In healthcare diagnostics, laboratory tests play a crucial role in identifying and diagnosing a wide range of medical conditions. However, interpreting test results is not always straightforward. An abnormal test result does not always confirm the presence of a disease, just as a normal result does not guarantee its absence. To assess the reliability of these diagnostic tools, healthcare practitioners rely on two key statistical indicators: sensitivity and specificity.
Sensitivity is the...

Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing

Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing

Hypothesis testing is a fundamental statistical tool that begins with the assumption that the null hypothesis H0 is true. During this process, two types of errors can occur: Type I and Type II. A Type I error refers to the incorrect rejection of a true null hypothesis, while a Type II error involves the failure to reject a false null hypothesis.
In hypothesis testing, the probability of making a Type I error, denoted as α, is commonly set at 0.05. This significance level indicates a 5% chance...

Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - II

Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - II

The Bradford Hill criteria serve as guidelines for establishing causative links in epidemiological research. Beyond Strength, Consistency, Specificity, and Temporality, key criteria also include Biological Gradient, Plausibility, Coherence, Experiment, and Analogy. These principles assist scientists in assessing the likelihood of causation in complex biological contexts. Below is a summary of these concepts:

Hazard Ratio

Hazard Ratio

The hazard ratio (HR) is a widely used measure in clinical trials to compare the risk of events, such as death or disease recurrence, between two groups over time. It reflects the ratio of hazard rates—the instantaneous risk of the event occurring—between a treatment group and a control group. This measure provides valuable insights into the relative effectiveness of a treatment by assessing how the risk of an event differs between the two groups.
For example, in a clinical trial evaluating a...

Receiver Operating Characteristic Plot

Receiver Operating Characteristic Plot

A ROC (Receiver Operating Characteristic) plot is a graphical tool used to assess the performance of a binary classification model by illustrating the trade-off between sensitivity (true positive rate) and specificity (false positive rate). By plotting sensitivity against 1 - specificity across various threshold settings, the ROC curve shows how well the model distinguishes between classes, with a curve closer to the top-left corner indicating a more accurate model. The area under the ROC curve...

Significance Testing: Overview

Significance Testing: Overview

Significance testing is a set of statistical methods used to test whether a claim about a parameter is valid. In analytical chemistry, significance testing is used primarily to determine whether the difference between two values comes from determinate or random errors. The effect of a particular change in the measurement protocol, analyst, or sample itself can cause a deviation from the expected result. In the case of a suspected deviation/outlier, we need to be able to confirm mathematically...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

GRADE guidance 24 optimizing the integration of randomized and non-randomized studies of interventions in evidence syntheses and health guidelines.

Journal of clinical epidemiology·2021

Same author

Visual transformation for guidelines presentation of the strength of recommendations and the certainty of evidence.

Journal of clinical epidemiology·2021

Same author

American Society of Hematology living guidelines on the use of anticoagulation for thromboprophylaxis in patients with COVID-19: July 2021 update on postdischarge thromboprophylaxis.

Blood advances·2021

Same author

COVID-19 transmission during swimming-related activities: a rapid systematic review.

BMC infectious diseases·2021

Same author

Cost-effectiveness of diagnostic strategies for venous thromboembolism: a systematic review.

Blood advances·2021

Same author

A taxonomy and framework for identifying and developing actionable statements in guidelines suggests avoiding informal recommendations.

Journal of clinical epidemiology·2021

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 21, 2026

Evidence-based Knowledge Synthesis and Hypothesis Validation: Navigating Biomedical Knowledge Bases via Explainable AI and Agentic Systems

Evidence-based Knowledge Synthesis and Hypothesis Validation: Navigating Biomedical Knowledge Bases via Explainable AI and Agentic Systems

Published on: June 13, 2025

[Diagnostic accuracy and linked evidence--testing the chain].

Holger J Schünemann¹, Reem Mustafa, Jan Brozek

¹Department of Clinical Epidemiology & Biostatistics, WHO Collaborating Center for Evidence-informed Policy, Cochrane Applicability and Recommendations Methods Group, McMaster University Health Sciences Centre, Hamilton, ON, Canada. schuneh@mcmaster.ca

Zeitschrift Fur Evidenz, Fortbildung Und Qualitat Im Gesundheitswesen

|June 12, 2012

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

This study details methods for assessing evidence quality for diagnostic tests and guidelines. It links diagnostic accuracy data to patient outcomes, guiding evidence-based recommendations.

More Related Videos

Advancing Dyslexia Assessment in Children Through Computerized Testing

Advancing Dyslexia Assessment in Children Through Computerized Testing

Published on: August 16, 2024

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 21, 2026

Evidence-based Knowledge Synthesis and Hypothesis Validation: Navigating Biomedical Knowledge Bases via Explainable AI and Agentic Systems

Evidence-based Knowledge Synthesis and Hypothesis Validation: Navigating Biomedical Knowledge Bases via Explainable AI and Agentic Systems

Published on: June 13, 2025

Advancing Dyslexia Assessment in Children Through Computerized Testing

Advancing Dyslexia Assessment in Children Through Computerized Testing

Published on: August 16, 2024

Area of Science:

Clinical Epidemiology
Health Technology Assessment
Evidence-Based Medicine

Background:

Assessing the quality of evidence for diagnostic test recommendations is crucial for clinical practice.
Existing frameworks require adaptation to effectively link diagnostic accuracy data with patient-important outcomes.

Purpose of the Study:

To describe the methodological underpinnings for evaluating the quality of evidence in diagnostic questions.
To outline strategies for translating diagnostic accuracy evidence into clinical practice guidelines and recommendations.

Main Methods:

Review of current considerations and research on linking diagnostic accuracy to patient outcomes.
Application of principles from the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) Working Group.

Main Results:

The article presents a framework for assessing confidence in estimates of effects for diagnostic questions.
It discusses the critical link between diagnostic accuracy data and patient-important outcomes.

Conclusions:

A clear pathway is established for moving from evidence on diagnostic tests to actionable recommendations.
The GRADE approach provides a robust foundation for enhancing the quality of evidence assessment in diagnostic guidelines.