Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

A Rehnquistean bed: the abortion issue revisited.

V F Maher, R Badin

    The Journal of the New York State Nurses' Association
    |December 1, 1990
    PubMed
    Summary

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    We'll take it! Should we?

    JONA'S healthcare law, ethics and regulation·2002
    Same author

    Damon or Pandora?

    Medicine, health care, and philosophy·2000
    Same author

    Patterns of allelic loss at the BRCA1 locus in Arabic women with breast cancer.

    International journal of molecular medicine·2000
    Same author

    But is it really ART? Economic, legal, and ethical implications of infertility technology.

    JONA'S healthcare law, ethics and regulation·2000
    Same author

    Countersigning notes by others.

    Nursing·1997
    Same author

    Legal and policy issues in long-term care.

    Health care management (Philadelphia, Pa.)·1997

    Societal laws can conflict with individual autonomy, particularly concerning privacy rights and abortion. This article examines a Supreme Court decision on abortion and privacy, raising critical questions for individuals and professionals.

    Area of Science:

    • Law and Society
    • Bioethics
    • Public Health Policy

    Background:

    • Societal norms and laws often regulate individual behavior.
    • Conflicts arise when regulations infringe upon personal autonomy.
    • The intersection of privacy rights and abortion is a significant legal and ethical issue.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To critically analyze the Supreme Court's decision regarding abortion and privacy rights from the 1988-1989 term.
    • To explore the implications of this decision on individual autonomy and societal control.
    • To raise important questions for both individuals and professionals in relevant fields.

    Main Methods:

    • Critical examination of legal precedent and judicial reasoning.
    • Analysis of the Supreme Court's ruling in the context of privacy law.
    Keywords:
    Abortion Law--changesAbortion, InducedAmericasBehaviorChild RearingChild SupportDecentralizationDecision MakingDemographic FactorsDeveloped CountriesFamily And HouseholdFamily CharacteristicsFamily PlanningFamily RelationshipsFathersFertility Control, PostconceptionFetal Viability--legal aspectsFetus--legal aspectsGovernmentHuman RightsMothersNorth AmericaNorthern AmericaParentsPolitical FactorsPopulationPopulation DynamicsPregnancy--legal aspectsReproductionTime FactorsUnited States

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Review of scholarly and ethical perspectives on abortion and individual rights.

    • Main Results:

    • The Supreme Court's decision in the 1988-1989 term addressed the complex interplay between privacy rights and abortion.
    • The ruling highlights ongoing societal tensions regarding the balance between legal control and individual autonomy.
    • The examination reveals significant implications for reproductive rights and legal interpretation.

    Conclusions:

    • The Supreme Court's handling of abortion and privacy issues warrants critical review.
    • Understanding the legal and ethical dimensions of these issues is crucial for professionals and the public.
    • Further discourse is needed to navigate the challenges posed by societal regulation of individual autonomy in reproductive health.