Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 21, 2026

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting (Propensity Score) using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
Published on: January 8, 2020
Using multiple measures of inequalities to study the time trends in social inequalities in smoking
Rana Charafeddine1, Stefaan Demarest, Johan Van der Heyden
1Unit of Public Health and Surveillance, Scientific Institute of Public Health, Brussels, Belgium. Rana.Charafeddine@wiv-isp.be
Background:
The time trends in social inequalities in smoking have been examined in a number of international publications; however, these studies have rarely used multiple measures of health inequalities simultaneously. Also the analytical approach used often did not account, as recommended, for the changes in the relative distribution of social groups and the changes in the absolute level of the health outcome within social groups.
Methods:
Data from four successive waves of the Belgian Health Interview Survey (1997, 2001, 2004, 2008) were used to study the time trends in educational inequalities in daily smoking for those aged between 15 and 74 years. We estimated two measures of relative inequalities: the OR and the relative index of inequality; and two measures of absolute inequalities: the population attributable fraction and the slope index of inequality. Three of these measures (relative index of inequality, population attributable fraction, slope index of inequality) account for the change in the relative size of the social groups over time.
Results:
The four measures of inequality were consistent in showing significant inequalities among educational groups. The time trends, however, were less consistent. Measures of trends in relative inequalities witnessed a small linear increase. However, no substantial over time change was observed with the measures of absolute inequalities.
Conclusion:
The time trends in social inequalities in smoking varied according to the measure of inequality used. This study confirms the importance of using multiple measures of inequalities to understand and monitor social inequalities in smoking.
More Related Videos
06:39Electroencephalographic, Heart Rate, and Galvanic Skin Response Assessment for an Advertising Perception Study: Application to Antismoking Public Service Announcements
Published on: August 28, 2017
09:50Impact Assessment of Repeated Exposure of Organotypic 3D Bronchial and Nasal Tissue Culture Models to Whole Cigarette Smoke
Published on: February 12, 2015
Related Concept Videos
Statistical Methods for Analyzing Epidemiological Data
Observational Studies
There are three types of observational studies – Prospective, retrospective, and cross-sectional.
Prospective Study
Prospective studies, also known as longitudinal or cohort studies, are carried out by collecting future data from groups sharing similar characteristics. One example of...
Bias in Epidemiological Studies
Longitudinal Research
Cross-Sectional Research
Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...